• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估电子健康：如何使评估更具方法学稳健性。

Evaluating eHealth: how to make evaluation more methodologically robust.

机构信息

Division of Primary Care, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2009 Nov;6(11):e1000186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000186. Epub 2009 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000186
PMID:19956674
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2777393/
Abstract

In the third in a series of articles on evaluating eHealth, Richard Lilford and colleagues consider the evaluation of health IT systems as they are rolled out following preimplementation testing.

摘要

在关于评估电子健康的一系列文章的第三篇中，Richard Lilford 和他的同事们考虑了在进行预实施测试后推出健康信息技术系统时对其进行评估的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4b8/2777393/6cef7250937b/pmed.1000186.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4b8/2777393/a49cbfef8912/pmed.1000186.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4b8/2777393/6cef7250937b/pmed.1000186.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4b8/2777393/a49cbfef8912/pmed.1000186.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4b8/2777393/6cef7250937b/pmed.1000186.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating eHealth: how to make evaluation more methodologically robust.评估电子健康：如何使评估更具方法学稳健性。
PLoS Med. 2009 Nov;6(11):e1000186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000186. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
2
Evaluating eHealth: undertaking robust international cross-cultural eHealth research.评估电子健康：开展有力的国际跨文化电子健康研究。
PLoS Med. 2009 Sep;6(9):e1000105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000105. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
3
eHealth evaluation and dissemination research.电子健康评估与传播研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2007 May;32(5 Suppl):S119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.023.
4
Web sites related to methods for evaluating Web sites.与网站评估方法相关的网站。
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2001;21(4):83-9. doi: 10.1300/j006v21n04_06.
5
Snowballing citations.滚雪球式引用
BMJ. 2015 Dec 14;351:h6309. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6309.
6
Open standards in medical informatics.医学信息学中的开放标准。
Medinfo. 1995;8 Pt 1:177-81.
7
The reduction of uncertainty.不确定性的减少。
Br J Surg. 1998 Jan;85(1):115-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00547.x.
8
Critical assessment of healthcare informatics standards.医疗保健信息学标准的批判性评估。
Int J Med Inform. 1998 Feb;48(1-3):125-32. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(97)00117-2.
9
Evaluating eHealth interventions: the need for continuous systemic evaluation.评估电子健康干预措施：持续进行系统评估的必要性。
PLoS Med. 2009 Aug;6(8):e1000126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000126. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
10
'CHEATS': a generic information communication technology (ICT) evaluation framework.“CHEATS”：一种通用的信息通信技术（ICT）评估框架。
Comput Biol Med. 2002 May;32(3):209-20. doi: 10.1016/s0010-4825(02)00016-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Potential of a Digital Intervention to Enhance Couple Relationships (the Paired App): Mixed Methods Evaluation.探索数字干预对增进伴侣关系的潜力（配对应用程序）：混合方法评估
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Apr 14;13:e55433. doi: 10.2196/55433.
2
Evaluation of an organisational-level monetary incentive to promote the health and wellbeing of workers in small and medium-sized enterprises: A mixed-methods cluster randomised controlled trial.评估一项组织层面的货币激励措施对促进中小企业员工健康和福祉的作用：一项混合方法整群随机对照试验。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jul 6;3(7):e0001381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001381. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating eHealth interventions: the need for continuous systemic evaluation.评估电子健康干预措施：持续进行系统评估的必要性。
PLoS Med. 2009 Aug;6(8):e1000126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000126. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
2
Evaluating service delivery interventions to enhance patient safety.评估旨在提高患者安全的服务提供干预措施。
BMJ. 2008 Dec 17;337:a2764. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2764.
3
STARE-HI--Statement on reporting of evaluation studies in Health Informatics.STARE-HI——关于健康信息学中评估研究报告的声明。
Feasibility, usability and acceptability of a novel digital hybrid-system for reporting of routine maternal health information in Southern Tanzania: A mixed-methods study.
坦桑尼亚南部用于报告常规孕产妇健康信息的新型数字混合系统的可行性、可用性和可接受性：一项混合方法研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jan 12;3(1):e0000972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000972. eCollection 2023.
4
Implementation of Guidelines on Family Involvement for Persons with Psychotic Disorders (IFIP): A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.精神障碍患者家庭参与指南实施（IFIP）：一项集群随机对照试验。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2023 May;50(3):520-533. doi: 10.1007/s10488-023-01255-0. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
5
Improving the Safety of Medicines via Digital Technology: An Assessment of the Scope and Quality of Risk Minimization Websites in the United States and United Kingdom.利用数字技术提高药品安全性：对美国和英国风险最小化网站的范围和质量的评估。
Drug Saf. 2022 Mar;45(3):259-274. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01165-4. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
6
Stakeholders' Perceptions of the Implementation of a Patient-Centric Digital Health Application for Primary Healthcare in India.利益相关者对印度初级医疗保健中以患者为中心的数字健康应用实施情况的看法。
Healthc Inform Res. 2021 Oct;27(4):315-324. doi: 10.4258/hir.2021.27.4.315. Epub 2021 Oct 31.
7
The impact of paediatric dose range checking software.儿科剂量范围检查软件的影响。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Nov;28(Suppl 2):e18-e22. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002244. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
8
Sustainable Behavior Change for Health Supported by Person-Tailored, Adaptive, Risk-Aware Digital Coaching in a Social Context: Study Protocol for the STAR-C Research Programme.社会环境下基于个性化、自适应、风险感知的数字健康教练促进可持续行为改变：STAR-C 研究计划研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 1;9:593453. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.593453. eCollection 2021.
9
How effective are electronic medication systems in reducing medication error rates and associated harm among hospital inpatients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.电子药物系统在降低医院住院患者用药错误率及相关伤害方面的效果如何？一项系统评价与Meta分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jan 15;28(1):167-176. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa230.
10
IMPROV-ED trial: eHealth programme for faster recovery and reduced healthcare utilisation after CABG.IMPROV-ED试验：用于冠状动脉搭桥术后更快康复和减少医疗资源利用的电子健康计划。
Neth Heart J. 2021 Feb;29(2):80-87. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01508-9. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
Int J Med Inform. 2009 Jan;78(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.09.002. Epub 2008 Oct 18.
4
An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 4. One size does not fit all.患者安全研究的认识论：研究设计与解读框架。第4部分。一刀切并不适用。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Jun;17(3):178-81. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023663.
5
An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 3. End points and measurement.患者安全研究的认识论：研究设计与解读框架。第3部分。终点与测量。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Jun;17(3):170-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023655.
6
An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 2. Study design.患者安全研究的认识论：研究设计与解读框架。第二部分。研究设计。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Jun;17(3):163-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023648.
7
An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 1. Conceptualising and developing interventions.患者安全研究的认识论：研究设计与解读框架。第1部分。干预措施的概念化与开发。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Jun;17(3):158-62. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023630.
8
Contamination in trials of educational interventions.教育干预试验中的污染问题。
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Oct;11(43):iii, ix-107. doi: 10.3310/hta11430.
9
A proposed benefits evaluation framework for health information systems in Canada.加拿大卫生信息系统效益评估框架提案。
Healthc Q. 2007;10(1):112-6, 118.
10
Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care.系统评价：健康信息技术对医疗质量、效率和成本的影响
Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):742-52. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125. Epub 2006 Apr 11.