Bould M D, Hayter M A, Campbell D M, Chandra D B, Joo H S, Naik V N
The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, 555 University Avenue, Canada.
Br J Anaesth. 2009 Oct;103(4):570-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep221. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
Retention of skills and knowledge after neonatal resuscitation courses (NRP) is known to be problematic. The use of cognitive aids is mandatory in industries such as aviation, to avoid dependence on memory when decision-making in critical situations. We aimed to prospectively investigate the effect of a cognitive aid on the performance of simulated neonatal resuscitation.
Thirty-two anaesthesia residents were recruited. The intervention group had a poster detailing the NRP algorithm and the control group did not. Video recordings of each of the performances were analysed using a previously validated checklist by a peer, an expert anaesthetist, and an expert neonatologist.
The median (IQR) checklist score in the control group [18.2 (15.0-20.5)] was not significantly different from that in the intervention group [20.3 (18.3-21.3)] (P=0.08). When evaluated by the neonatologist, none of the subjects correctly performed all life-saving interventions necessary to pass the checklist. A minority of the intervention group used the cognitive aid frequently.
Retention of skills after NRP training is poor. The infrequent use of the cognitive aid may be the reason that it did not improve performance. Further research is required to investigate whether cognitive aids can be useful if their use is incorporated into the NRP training.
新生儿复苏课程(NRP)后技能和知识的保留存在问题。在航空等行业,使用认知辅助工具是强制性的,以避免在危急情况下决策时依赖记忆。我们旨在前瞻性地研究认知辅助工具对模拟新生儿复苏表现的影响。
招募了32名麻醉住院医师。干预组有一张详细说明NRP算法的海报,而对照组没有。由一名同行、一名麻醉专家和一名新生儿专家使用先前验证的检查表对每次表现的视频记录进行分析。
对照组的检查表得分中位数(IQR)[18.2(15.0 - 20.5)]与干预组[20.3(18.3 - 21.3)]无显著差异(P = 0.08)。由新生儿专家评估时,没有受试者正确执行检查表中所有必要的救生干预措施。干预组中少数人频繁使用认知辅助工具。
NRP培训后技能保留不佳。认知辅助工具使用不频繁可能是其未改善表现的原因。需要进一步研究以调查如果将认知辅助工具的使用纳入NRP培训是否会有用。