Mommers Lars, Wulterkens Dennie, Winkel Steven, van den Bogaard Bas, Eppich Walter J, van Mook Walther N K A
Department of Simulation in Healthcare, MUMC, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, MUMC, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Adv Simul (Lond). 2025 Mar 28;10(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41077-025-00340-8.
Effective information sharing is crucial for emergency care teams to maintain an accurate shared mental model. This study describes the design, simulation-based testing and implementation of a team reflexivity aid to facilitate in-action information sharing during resuscitations.
A five-phase team-centred iterative design process was employed. Phase 1 involved a literature review to identify in-action cognitive aids. Phase 2 focused on conceptual design, followed by simulation-based testing and modifications in phase 3. Implementation through simulation-based user training occurred in phase 4 at a large non-university teaching hospital. Phase 5 evaluated the aid among resuscitation team members in the emergency department after one year.
The phase 1 literature review identified 58 cognitive aids, with only 10 designed as 'team aid'. Studies using team information screens found increase team and task performance in simulation-based environments, with no evaluations in authentic workplaces. Phase 2 resulted in a three-section team reflexivity aid, iteratively modified in three rounds of simulation-based testing (N = 30 groups) phase 3 resulted in a team reflexivity aid containing five sections: resuscitation times and intervals, patient history, interventions on a longitudinal timeline, differential diagnosis and a quick review section. Phase 4 consisted of reflexivity aid user training with simulation-based education (N = 60 sessions) and the creation of a digital entry form to store data in the patient's electronic medical record. Evaluation after one year in phase 5, (N = 84) showed perceived improvements in communication (3.82 ± 0.77), documentation (4.25 ± 0.66), cognitive load (3.94 ± 0.68), and team performance (3.80 ± 0.76) on a 5-point Likert scale. Thematic analysis of user feedback identified improvements in both teamwork and taskwork. Teamwork enhancements included better situation awareness, communication and team participation. Taskwork improvements were seen in drug administration and clinical reasoning.
This study demonstrated the successful development and implementation of a Team Reflexivity Aid for Cardiac arrests using simulation methodology. This task-focused team tool improved perceived team situation awareness, communication, and overall performance. The research highlights the interplay between task- and teamwork in healthcare settings, underscoring the potential for taskwork-oriented tools to benefit team dynamics. These findings warrant further investigation into team-supportive interventions and their impact on resuscitation outcomes.
有效的信息共享对于急救团队维持准确的共享心智模型至关重要。本研究描述了一种团队反思辅助工具的设计、基于模拟的测试及实施过程,以促进复苏过程中的即时信息共享。
采用了一个以团队为中心的五阶段迭代设计过程。第一阶段进行文献综述以识别即时认知辅助工具。第二阶段专注于概念设计,随后在第三阶段进行基于模拟的测试及修改。第四阶段在一家大型非大学教学医院通过基于模拟的用户培训进行实施。第五阶段在一年后对急诊科的复苏团队成员进行该辅助工具的评估。
第一阶段的文献综述识别出58种认知辅助工具,其中只有10种被设计为“团队辅助工具”。使用团队信息屏幕的研究发现,在基于模拟的环境中团队和任务绩效有所提高,但在实际工作场所未进行评估。第二阶段产生了一个分为三个部分的团队反思辅助工具,在三轮基于模拟的测试(N = 30组)中进行了迭代修改。第三阶段产生了一个包含五个部分的团队反思辅助工具:复苏时间和间隔、患者病史、纵向时间轴上的干预措施、鉴别诊断和快速回顾部分。第四阶段包括通过基于模拟的教育进行反思辅助工具用户培训(N = 60次课程),并创建一个数字输入表单以将数据存储在患者的电子病历中。第五阶段在一年后的评估(N = 84)显示,在5点李克特量表上,沟通(3.82±0.77)、记录(4.25±0.66)、认知负荷(3.94±0.68)和团队绩效(3.80±0.76)方面均有明显改善。对用户反馈的主题分析确定了团队协作和任务执行方面的改进。团队协作的增强包括更好的态势感知、沟通和团队参与。在药物管理和临床推理方面看到了任务执行的改进。
本研究展示了使用模拟方法成功开发并实施用于心脏骤停的团队反思辅助工具。这种以任务为重点的团队工具改善了团队的态势感知、沟通和整体绩效。该研究突出了医疗环境中任务与团队协作之间的相互作用,强调了以任务为导向的工具对团队动态产生益处的潜力。这些发现值得进一步研究团队支持性干预措施及其对复苏结果的影响。