• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中筋膜间和筋膜内保留神经的功能及肿瘤学结果比较

Functional and oncologic outcomes comparing interfascial and intrafascial nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies.

作者信息

Potdevin Lindsay, Ercolani Matt, Jeong Jeongyun, Kim Isaac Yi

机构信息

Section of Urologic Oncology, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2009 Sep;23(9):1479-84. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0369.

DOI:10.1089/end.2009.0369
PMID:19694530
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The impact of intrafascial versus interfascial nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy on oncologic and postoperative outcome is still controversial. This manuscript compares the outcomes of intrafascial versus interfascial techniques of nerve sparing used during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) at our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of the 171 patients who underwent RALRP at our institution from January 2006 through December 2007, the charts of 147 patients who underwent bilateral nerve sparing procedure were reviewed retrospectively. During the study period, the preferred technique of nerve sparing at our institution changed from the conventional interfascial approach to athermal intrafascial robotic (AIR) approach. The rates of positive surgical margins (+SMs), continence, and potency were measured.

RESULTS

Perioperative characteristics and complication rates were similar between the two groups. Continence rates at 1, 3, and 6 months increased from 27.3%, 68.8%, and 93.5%, respectively, after the interfascial procedure to 68.6%, 84.3%, and 92.9% after the AIR procedure. Potency rates at 3, 6, and 9 months in the interfascial group were 16.7%, 43.8%, and 66.7%, respectively, whereas in the AIR group they improved to 24.2%, 81.8%, and 90.9%. The rates of +SMs in pT2 disease were 5.88% in the interfascial group and 7.55% in the AIR group (not significant), whereas in pT3, +SMs were 22.2% in the interfascial group and 41.18% in the AIR group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

AIR technique greatly improved potency rate and shortened the time to return of continence following RALRP. This improved outcome, though, was achieved at the price of higher +SM rates in patients with pT3 disease.

摘要

引言

根治性前列腺切除术中筋膜内与筋膜间保留神经对肿瘤学及术后结果的影响仍存在争议。本文比较了我院机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RALRP)中筋膜内与筋膜间保留神经技术的结果。

材料与方法

回顾性分析了2006年1月至2007年12月在我院接受RALRP的171例患者的病历,其中147例行双侧神经保留手术。在研究期间,我院首选的神经保留技术从传统的筋膜间方法转变为非热筋膜内机器人(AIR)方法。测量手术切缘阳性(+SMs)率、控尿率和性功能恢复率。

结果

两组围手术期特征和并发症发生率相似。筋膜间手术后1个月、3个月和6个月的控尿率分别从27.3%、68.8%和93.5%提高到AIR手术后的68.6%、84.3%和92.9%。筋膜间组3个月、6个月和9个月的性功能恢复率分别为16.7%、43.8%和66.7%,而AIR组分别提高到24.2%、81.8%和90.9%。pT2疾病中+SMs率在筋膜间组为5.88%,AIR组为7.55%(无统计学意义),而在pT3中,筋膜间组为22.2%,AIR组为41.18%(p<0.05)。

结论

AIR技术显著提高了RALRP后的性功能恢复率,并缩短了控尿恢复时间。然而,这一改善是以pT3疾病患者较高的+SMs率为代价的。

相似文献

1
Functional and oncologic outcomes comparing interfascial and intrafascial nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中筋膜间和筋膜内保留神经的功能及肿瘤学结果比较
J Endourol. 2009 Sep;23(9):1479-84. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0369.
2
A matched-pair comparison between bilateral intrafascial and interfascial nerve-sparing techniques in extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.双侧筋膜内与筋膜间神经保留技术在腹膜外腹腔镜前列腺根治术中的配对比较。
Asian J Androl. 2013 Jul;15(4):513-7. doi: 10.1038/aja.2012.157. Epub 2013 May 27.
3
Intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with a laparoscopic robot-assisted extraperitoneal approach: early oncological and functional results.筋膜内神经保留腹腔镜机器人辅助经腹膜外入路根治性前列腺切除术:早期肿瘤学和功能结果。
J Endourol. 2010 Apr;24(4):577-82. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0069.
4
Oncologic results, functional outcomes, and complication rates of transperitoneal robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: single centre's experience.经腹机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的肿瘤学结果、功能结局及并发症发生率:单中心经验
Actas Urol Esp. 2015 Mar;39(2):70-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 May 22.
5
Extrafascial versus interfascial nerve-sparing technique for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: comparison of functional outcomes and positive surgical margins characteristics.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术中筋膜外与筋膜间神经保留技术:功能结局及手术切缘阳性特征的比较
Urology. 2009 Sep;74(3):611-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.01.092. Epub 2009 Jul 18.
6
Intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy improves patients' postoperative continence recovery and erectile function: A pooled analysis based on available literatures.筋膜内保留神经的根治性前列腺切除术可改善患者术后控尿恢复及勃起功能:基于现有文献的汇总分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(29):e11297. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011297.
7
Do we need the nerve sparing radical prostatectomy techniques (intrafascial vs. interfascial) in men with erectile dysfunction? Results of a single-centre study.对于患有勃起功能障碍的男性,我们是否需要保留神经的根治性前列腺切除术技术(筋膜内与筋膜间)?一项单中心研究的结果。
World J Urol. 2015 Mar;33(3):301-7. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1302-9. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
8
Bilateral vs unilateral laparoscopic intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of surgical and functional outcomes in 457 patients.双侧与单侧腹腔镜筋膜内神经保留根治性前列腺切除术:457 例患者的手术和功能结局评估。
BJU Int. 2011 Aug;108(4):583-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09836.x. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
9
Robot-assisted laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical cystoprostatectomy with bilateral extended lymph node dissection and intracorporeal studer pouch construction: outcomes of first 12 cases.机器人辅助腹腔镜下保留神经的根治性膀胱前列腺切除术,双侧扩大淋巴结清扫术和腔内置 Studer 袋构建:前 12 例的结果。
J Endourol. 2011 Sep;25(9):1469-79. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0632. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
10
Intrafascial dissection significantly increases positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence rates after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.筋膜内解剖显著增加机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后的手术切缘阳性率和生化复发率。
Urol Int. 2012;89(1):17-24. doi: 10.1159/000339254. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel pelvis-prostate model BPPP predicts immediate urinary continence after Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.一种新型的骨盆-前列腺模型 BPPP 可预测保留耻骨后间隙的机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治术后即刻尿控。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 20;14(1):19271. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70080-8.
2
Optimizing Nerve Sparing in Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Investigation of Traditional and Modified Endopelvic Fascia Preservation Techniques.优化机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的神经保留:传统与改良盆腔筋膜保留技术的对比研究
Acta Inform Med. 2023;32(1):76-81. doi: 10.5455/aim.2024.32.76-81.
3
Transversal approach via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision versus standard approach of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: a retrospective analysis.
经膀胱颈和前列腺联合纵行切口的横切入路与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的标准入路比较:回顾性分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Mar 6;24(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12015-0.
4
Different Nerve-Sparing Techniques during Radical Prostatectomy and Their Impact on Functional Outcomes.根治性前列腺切除术中不同的神经保留技术及其对功能结局的影响。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 22;14(7):1601. doi: 10.3390/cancers14071601.
5
Impacts of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy Prior to Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy on Postoperative Hormonal- and Sexual-Related Quality of Life - Assessment by Patient-Reported Questionnaire.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术前行新辅助激素治疗对术后激素及性功能相关生活质量的影响——基于患者报告问卷的评估
Res Rep Urol. 2022 Feb 19;14:39-48. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S342063. eCollection 2022.
6
Neurovascular bundle preservation in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: How I do it after 15.000 cases.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时神经血管束的保护:我在完成 15000 例手术后的做法。
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Mar-Apr;48(2):212-219. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.99.04.
7
A review of technical progression in the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的技术进展综述。
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 May;10(5):2171-2177. doi: 10.21037/tau.2020.03.17.
8
Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Maneuvers to Attenuate Erectile Dysfunction: Technical Description and Video Compilation.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术缓解勃起功能障碍的操作:技术描述和视频汇编。
J Endourol. 2021 Nov;35(11):1601-1609. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0081.
9
Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Current perspectives.保留神经的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:当前观点
Asian J Urol. 2021 Jan;8(1):2-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2020.05.012. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
10
Benefits of erectile function recovery programs after radical prostatectomy (Review).根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能恢复计划的益处(综述)
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Sep;20(3):2406-2410. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8934. Epub 2020 Jun 24.