• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜单孔胆囊切除术:一种安全且可重复的替代方法。

Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a safe and reproducible alternative.

作者信息

Vidal Oscar, Valentini Mauro, Espert Juan J, Ginesta Cesar, Jimeno Jaime, Martinez Alberto, Benarroch Guerson, Garcia-Valdecasas Juan C

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona Villarroel 170, Escalera 9-4 Planta Barcelona, 08036 Spain.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Oct;19(5):599-602. doi: 10.1089/lap.2009.0205.

DOI:10.1089/lap.2009.0205
PMID:19694564
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy via the three-trocar technique is widely used for symptomatic gallbladder stones. In this article, we describe the initial experience with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) cholecystectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between February and April 2009, patients referred for cholecystectomy to the General Surgery Unit of our institution who agreed to undergo LESS were included in a prospective study. All operations were performed by the same surgical team that was specially trained in this type of surgery. The umbilicus was the sole point of entry for all patients. The same operative technique was used in all patients. Data of patients undergoing LESS cholecystectomy were compared with those from an uncontrolled group of patients undergoing standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the same study period.

RESULTS

The LESS and standard cholecystectomy groups included 19 patients each. LESS was successfully performed in all patients and none required conversion to an open procedure or a conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy by adding more entry ports. The median operating time of 62 minutes in the LESS group was not significantly different than that in the standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy group.

CONCLUSIONS

LESS cholecystectomy was technically feasible, safe, and represents a reproducible alternative to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

摘要

背景

经三孔技术的腹腔镜胆囊切除术广泛应用于有症状的胆囊结石。在本文中,我们描述了经自然腔道内镜手术(LESS)胆囊切除术的初步经验。

患者与方法

2009年2月至4月期间,我院普通外科收治的同意接受LESS的胆囊切除术患者被纳入一项前瞻性研究。所有手术均由经过此类手术专门培训的同一手术团队进行。脐部是所有患者的唯一入路点。所有患者均采用相同的手术技术。将接受LESS胆囊切除术患者的数据与同一研究期间接受标准腹腔镜胆囊切除术的非对照患者组的数据进行比较。

结果

LESS组和标准胆囊切除术组各有19例患者。所有患者LESS手术均成功完成,无一例需要通过增加更多入路端口转为开放手术或传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术。LESS组的中位手术时间为62分钟,与标准腹腔镜胆囊切除术组无显著差异。

结论

LESS胆囊切除术在技术上可行、安全,是标准腹腔镜胆囊切除术的一种可重复的替代方法。

相似文献

1
Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a safe and reproducible alternative.腹腔镜单孔胆囊切除术:一种安全且可重复的替代方法。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Oct;19(5):599-602. doi: 10.1089/lap.2009.0205.
2
Single-incision versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of surgical outcomes from a single institution.单孔与标准腹腔镜胆囊切除术:来自单一机构的手术结果比较。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011 Oct;21(8):683-6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0047. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
3
Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study.腹腔镜单部位(LESS)与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的随机前瞻性研究。
J Surg Res. 2011 Apr;166(2):e109-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.11.885. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
4
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for day surgery procedure: are we prepared?日间手术的单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:我们准备好了吗?
Am Surg. 2012 Apr;78(4):436-9.
5
Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) cholecystectomy.经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Feb;13(2):188-92. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0735-0. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
6
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery appendectomy.腹腔镜单部位手术阑尾切除术。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Mar;24(3):686-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0661-6. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
7
Transumbilical multiple-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TUMP-LC): a prospective analysis of 50 initial patients.经脐多端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(TUMP-LC):50例初治患者的前瞻性分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010 Apr;20(3):211-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2009.0395.
8
Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy: the first 100 patients.经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:首批100例患者
Am Surg. 2009 Aug;75(8):681-5; discussion 685-6.
9
Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study.腹腔镜单孔胆囊切除术:一项随机对照研究。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2012 Mar;21(2):113-7. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2011.577787. Epub 2011 May 16.
10
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children using standard straight instruments: a surgeon's early experience.使用标准直器械进行儿童单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:外科医生的早期经验。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011 Jul-Aug;21(6):555-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2010.0512. Epub 2011 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单孔机器人胆囊切除术与单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2023 Jun 14;7(5):709-718. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12688. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Single-incision robotic adrenalectomy (SIRA): the future of adrenal surgery?单切口机器人肾上腺切除术(SIRA):肾上腺手术的未来?
Gland Surg. 2020 Jun;9(3):853-858. doi: 10.21037/gs-2019-ra-02.
3
Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Hybrid Russe Procedure for Scaphoid Nonunion.
Hybrid Russe 手术治疗舟状骨骨不连的临床和患者报告结局。
Hand (N Y). 2022 Jan;17(1):13-22. doi: 10.1177/1558944720911214. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
4
Clinical outcomes of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔机器人胆囊切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床效果比较。
Can J Surg. 2019 Feb 1;62(1):52-56. doi: 10.1503/cjs.000118.
5
Single-site robotic cholecystectomy: comparison of clinical outcome and the learning curves in relation to surgeon experience in a community teaching hospital.单部位机器人胆囊切除术:社区教学医院中临床结果及与外科医生经验相关的学习曲线比较
BMC Surg. 2018 Jun 11;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0373-8.
6
Magnetic surgery: first U.S. experience with a novel device.磁外科:首例美国新型装置应用经验。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):895-899. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5762-z. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
7
Cosmesis, patient satisfaction, and quality of life after da Vinci Single-Site cholecystectomy and multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term results from a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.达芬奇单孔胆囊切除术与多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的美容效果、患者满意度及生活质量:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验的短期结果
Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3242-3250. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5353-4. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
8
Remains of the day: biliary complications related to single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.往日余波:单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术相关的胆道并发症
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan 21;20(3):843-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i3.843.
9
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and overweight patients.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与超重患者。
Obes Surg. 2014 Jan;24(1):123-7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1041-9.
10
The outcomes of SILS cholecystectomy in comparison with classic four-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的疗效比较。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2012 Dec;7(4):286-93. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2011.30811. Epub 2012 Sep 29.