Laboratoire de Pharmacologie Expérimentale et Clinique, Faculté de Médecine, av du Professeur Léon-Bernard, 35043 Rennes, France.
Eur Psychiatry. 1995;10 Suppl 3:129s-35s. doi: 10.1016/0924-9338(96)80094-0.
The effect of zopiclone (7.5 mg) on attention, vigilance and memory components was evaluated during a nocturnal period in comparison to a placebo, to zolpidem (10 mg) and to flunitrazepam (1 mg) in a double blind, randomized study, after administration of a single dose in 16 young healthy volunteers. It appears that there is a clear effect on attention and vigilance; this effect is apparent during the kinetic phase of the absorption of the medication. The effect on memory is transient and is absent four hours after the ingestion of the drug. The objective results are not strictly consistent with the chronology of the subjective parameters (Leeds scale - Visual Analogue Scale). The three hypnotics under comparison do not fundamentally differ except in their kinetic/pharmacodynamic effect relationship. One important fact, taking the parameters as a whole, is that there is no objective "residual" effect.
在一项双盲、随机研究中,16 名年轻健康志愿者单次给药后,比较唑吡坦(7.5mg)、佐匹克隆(10mg)和氟硝西泮(1mg)在夜间对注意力、警觉性和记忆成分的影响,结果显示对注意力和警觉性有明显影响,这种影响在药物吸收的动力学阶段明显。对记忆的影响是短暂的,在服药后 4 小时消失。客观结果与主观参数(利兹量表-视觉模拟量表)的时间顺序并不完全一致。这三种催眠药的动力学/药效学关系不同,但除了这一点之外,并没有根本的区别。一个重要的事实是,从整体上看,没有客观的“残留”效应。