Noble S, Langtry H D, Lamb H M
Adis International Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.
Drugs. 1998 Feb;55(2):277-302. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199855020-00015.
Zopiclone is a non-benzodiazepine hypnotic which was first reviewed in Drugs in 1986. At that time, zopiclone had shown hypnotic efficacy superior to that of placebo, but had not been extensively compared with benzodiazepine hypnotics in patients with insomnia. A much larger body of clinical data is now available, allowing a more detailed evaluation than was previously possible. Together with results from earlier studies, subsequent clinical trials have shown that zopiclone is generally at least as effective as the benzodiazepines (regardless of duration of action) in the treatment of insomnia, although comparisons between zopiclone and flurazepam have produced inconsistent results. Tolerance to the effects of zopiclone was not seen in short term clinical trials (< or = 4 weeks); data from longer term studies are conflicting and the potential for tolerance during long term zopiclone treatment is therefore unclear. Zopiclone has a relatively low propensity to cause residual clinical effects (such as difficulty in waking or reduced morning concentration). Rebound of insomnia to a level below that at baseline can occur after withdrawal of zopiclone, but, on the basis of data from short term studies, does not appear to be common. Data from prescription-event monitoring suggest that zopiclone does not have a high dependence potential (at least in those who are not regular drug abusers/addicts). Zopiclone is well tolerated in both the elderly and younger patients with insomnia. A bitter aftertaste is usually the most common adverse event, but is relatively infrequent (3.6% in the largest available postmarketing study). Thus, zopiclone is now firmly established as an effective and well tolerated hypnotic agent. Although the available data on rebound insomnia and dependence liability are encouraging, potential differences between zopiclone and the benzodiazepines in these respects may have little clinical relevance in the context of short term intermittent use of hypnotics, as it currently recommended. A low propensity for rebound insomnia and dependence might prove valuable during long term hypnotic therapy (which, although not recommended, is a clinical reality). However, the risk-benefit profile of zopiclone in this context remains unknown. Nevertheless, zopiclone is clearly a suitable alternative to the benzodiazepines for the short term treatment of insomnia.
佐匹克隆是一种非苯二氮䓬类催眠药,于1986年首次在《药物》杂志上被综述。当时,佐匹克隆已显示出优于安慰剂的催眠疗效,但尚未在失眠患者中与苯二氮䓬类催眠药进行广泛比较。现在有了更多的临床数据,使得比以前更详细的评估成为可能。结合早期研究结果,后续临床试验表明,佐匹克隆在治疗失眠方面通常至少与苯二氮䓬类药物(无论作用持续时间如何)一样有效,尽管佐匹克隆与氟西泮之间的比较结果并不一致。在短期临床试验(≤4周)中未观察到对佐匹克隆作用的耐受性;长期研究的数据相互矛盾,因此佐匹克隆长期治疗期间耐受性的可能性尚不清楚。佐匹克隆产生残留临床效应(如觉醒困难或早晨注意力下降)的倾向相对较低。停用佐匹克隆后,失眠可能会反弹至基线以下水平,但根据短期研究数据,这种情况似乎并不常见。处方事件监测数据表明佐匹克隆没有很高的依赖性潜力(至少在那些非经常药物滥用者/成瘾者中)。佐匹克隆在老年和年轻失眠患者中耐受性良好。口苦通常是最常见的不良事件,但相对较少见(在最大规模的上市后研究中为3.6%)。因此,佐匹克隆现在已被牢固地确立为一种有效且耐受性良好的催眠药物。尽管关于反弹性失眠和依赖性的现有数据令人鼓舞,但在目前推荐的短期间歇性使用催眠药的情况下,佐匹克隆与苯二氮䓬类药物在这些方面的潜在差异可能在临床上几乎没有相关性。在长期催眠治疗期间(虽然不推荐,但却是临床现实),反弹性失眠和依赖性倾向较低可能被证明是有价值的。然而,在这种情况下佐匹克隆的风险效益概况仍然未知。尽管如此,佐匹克隆显然是苯二氮䓬类药物用于短期治疗失眠的合适替代品。