Suppr超能文献

婴儿和儿童胸部按压时胸廓硬度的专家临床评估。

Expert clinical assessment of thorax stiffness of infants and children during chest compressions.

作者信息

Arbogast Kristy B, Nishisaki Akira, Balasubramanian Sriram, Nysaether Jon, Niles Dana, Sutton Robert M, Roberts Kathryn E, Nadkarni Lauren, Boulet John, Maltese Matthew R, Nadkarni Vinay M

机构信息

Center for Injury Research and Prevention, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2009 Oct;80(10):1187-91. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Aug 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-fidelity manikins have been shown to be useful in teaching appropriate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) techniques. Similarity of manikin chest compression characteristics to real children is desirable. Little data exists on thorax stiffness in infants and children to guide manikin construction.

OBJECTIVE

To determine a 'consensus clinical-expert assessment' of the pediatric chest stiffness for two specific age groups-infants and 5-year-olds.

METHODS

Four manikins in each of two sizes (5-year child, 6-month infant) were identically constructed, except for thorax downstroke spring stiffness. Health care providers with pediatric CPR experience provided chest compressions to each manikin in random order, masked to thoracic stiffness. Each health care provider was instructed to identify the manikin with downstroke thoracic stiffness most similar to children on whom they have performed chest compressions. Duplicate assessment of a randomly selected, previously assessed manikin was performed to assess health care provider consistency using the kappa statistic. Subject inter-rater agreement on which manikin best approximated a child of that age was assessed by calculating the percentage of subjects who identified that manikin as the best approximation of an actual child.

RESULTS

A convenience sample of 63 international experts was obtained: 52 from Critical Care, 3 from Emergency Medicine, 4 from Pediatrics, and 4 from other specialties. There were 6 and 8 experts whose assessments were inconsistent for the infant manikins and child manikins, respectively. Approximately half of the subjects agreed on a single manikin as the best approximation of the human for both the infant (46%) and child manikins (43%). Excluding assessments of stiffness "out of range", the percentage of experts who agreed on a single manikin as the best approximation for the human increased to approximately 90% for each manikin size.

CONCLUSION

Experienced health care providers consistently identified and agreed on the manikin thorax stiffness which they felt best approximated downstroke chest compression stiffness of children and infants. Expert opinion can be used to create manikins with realistic spring stiffness for CPR training. Further study is needed to evaluate whether enhanced manikin biofidelity will improve CPR performance.

摘要

背景

高保真人体模型已被证明在教授适当的心肺复苏(CPR)技术方面很有用。人体模型胸部按压特征与真实儿童的相似性是理想的。关于婴儿和儿童胸部僵硬程度的数据很少,无法指导人体模型的构建。

目的

确定针对两个特定年龄组(婴儿和5岁儿童)的儿科胸部僵硬程度的“共识临床专家评估”。

方法

除了胸部下行弹簧刚度外,两种尺寸(5岁儿童、6个月婴儿)的每种各四个人体模型的构造完全相同。有儿科CPR经验的医疗保健提供者以随机顺序对每个人体模型进行胸部按压,对胸部僵硬程度不知情。指示每位医疗保健提供者识别下行胸部僵硬程度与他们进行过胸部按压的儿童最相似的人体模型。对随机选择的、先前评估过的人体模型进行重复评估,以使用kappa统计量评估医疗保健提供者的一致性。通过计算将该人体模型识别为实际儿童最佳近似值的受试者百分比,评估受试者之间关于哪个人体模型最接近该年龄儿童的评分者间一致性。

结果

获得了一个由63名国际专家组成的便利样本:52名来自重症监护,3名来自急诊医学,4名来自儿科学,4名来自其他专业。分别有6名和8名专家对婴儿人体模型和儿童人体模型的评估不一致。大约一半的受试者一致认为单个人体模型是婴儿(46%)和儿童人体模型(43%)最接近人类的近似值。排除“超出范围”的僵硬程度评估后,对于每种人体模型尺寸,一致认为单个人体模型是最接近人类的近似值的专家百分比增加到约90%。

结论

有经验的医疗保健提供者一致识别并认同他们认为最接近儿童和婴儿下行胸部按压僵硬程度的人体模型胸部僵硬程度。专家意见可用于创建具有逼真弹簧刚度的人体模型用于CPR培训。需要进一步研究以评估增强的人体模型生物逼真度是否会改善CPR表现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验