Gosselin P, Laberge B
Ecole de psychologie, Université Laval, G1K 7P4 Québec, Canada.
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):351-61.
Generalized Anxiety disorder (GAD) is a widespread psychiatric syndrome involving significant consequences on people's health. However, recent data show that this disorder has received little attention when compared to other anxiety disorders. A review of the publication on GAD also stated that the majority of research has been conducted on descriptive issues, whereas etiological factors received lower rates of publication. This may be explained by the fact that changes in the conceptualization of GAD slowed down the progression of researches focussing on the identification of factors implicated in the development and the maintenance of its symptoms. For example, in the third version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental disorders (DSM) published in 1980, GAD could only be assigned if patients had a persistent anxiety without reporting specific symptoms of other anxiety disorders (eg Specific Phobias, Panic Disorder, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder). With DSM III-R and DSM IV, excessive worry became the central feature of GAD, which increased its diagnostic validity. Taking that into account, where do we stand in the comprehension of GAD? What are the etiological factors identified as playing a role in the development and the maintenance of GAD and its central feature, excessive and uncontrollable worry? The goal of this article consists to provide answers to these questions by reviewing the literature of the current knowledge of GAD and examining various theories and explanatory models available. Firstly, many studies suggest that environmental factors are implicated in the development and maintenance of GAD. However, the majority of researches rests on an out-of-date conceptualization of GAD. Furthermore, the nature of experimental designs used in researches limits their conclusion. The first environmental factor documented is negative life events. Researchers noted that the occurrence of one or more negative life events being significant and appearing in an unexpected way was associa-ted with an increase in the risk to develop a GAD (eg. Familial problems (eg conflicts, abuses), considered as chronic stress-inducing situations, have also been suggested as etiological factor of GAD. Among the other environmental factors identified are separation during childhood, role inversion during childhood, lack of social interactions, poor life satisfaction, and modeling of a relative having an anxiety disorder. The cognitive and behavioral approach has been widely used during the last two decades to precise the etiology of GAD. First of all, some studies have pointed out the function of worry, which is to suppress images associated with negative thoughts (eg. Thus, GAD patients seem to develop excessive worries in order to prevent more negative feeling associated with the images of a thought. Other authors suggested that a deficit of attention might be responsible of excessive worry. Finally, some cognitive variables such as intolerance of uncertainty, false beliefs about worry, negative problem orientation and cognitive avoidance have been suggested as playing a determinant role in the development and maintenance of GAD. In order to resume the empirical findings available in the literature, an etiological model gathering the cognitive, behavioral, and environmental factors implicated in GAD is proposed. This model suggests that GAD is the result of a psychological vulnerability activated by a tension resulting from a negative event. Finally, recommendations are brought concerning future researches on GAD and its central characteristic, excessive and uncontrollable worry.
广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)是一种普遍存在的精神综合征,会对人们的健康产生重大影响。然而,最近的数据表明,与其他焦虑症相比,这种障碍受到的关注较少。一项关于GAD的出版物综述也指出,大多数研究都集中在描述性问题上,而病因因素的发表率较低。这可能是因为GAD概念化的变化减缓了专注于识别与其症状发展和维持相关因素的研究进展。例如,在1980年出版的第三版《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM)中,只有当患者存在持续焦虑且未报告其他焦虑症的特定症状(如特定恐惧症、惊恐障碍、强迫症)时,才能诊断为GAD。随着DSM III-R和DSM IV的出现,过度担忧成为了GAD的核心特征,这提高了其诊断效度。考虑到这一点,我们对GAD的理解处于什么阶段呢?在GAD及其核心特征——过度且无法控制的担忧的发展和维持中,被确定起作用的病因因素有哪些呢?本文的目的是通过回顾当前关于GAD的知识文献并审视各种可用的理论和解释模型,来回答这些问题。首先,许多研究表明环境因素与GAD的发展和维持有关。然而,大多数研究基于过时的GAD概念化。此外,研究中使用的实验设计的性质限制了其结论。第一个被记录的环境因素是负面生活事件。研究人员指出,一个或多个负面生活事件的发生具有显著性且以意外方式出现,与患GAD风险的增加相关(例如,家庭问题(如冲突、虐待),被认为是慢性应激源,也被认为是GAD的病因因素。在其他确定的环境因素中,有童年时期的分离、童年时期角色的颠倒、缺乏社交互动、生活满意度低以及有焦虑症亲属的行为示范。在过去二十年中,认知和行为方法被广泛用于明确GAD的病因。首先,一些研究指出了担忧的作用,即抑制与负面想法相关的意象(例如,因此,GAD患者似乎会产生过度担忧,以防止与某个想法的意象相关的更负面情绪。其他作者认为注意力缺陷可能是过度担忧的原因。最后,一些认知变量,如对不确定性的不耐受、对担忧的错误信念、消极的问题取向和认知回避,被认为在GAD的发展和维持中起决定性作用。为了总结文献中现有的实证研究结果,提出了一个收集与GAD相关的认知、行为和环境因素的病因模型。该模型表明,GAD是由负面事件引发的紧张激活的心理易感性的结果。最后,针对未来关于GAD及其核心特征——过度且无法控制的担忧的研究提出了建议。