von Keyserlingk M A G, Rushen J, de Passillé A M, Weary D M
Animal Welfare Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Sep;92(9):4101-11. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2326.
Concerns about the welfare of animals typically include 3 questions: is the animal functioning well (e.g., good health, productivity, etc.), is the animal feeling well (e.g., absence of pain, etc.), and is the animal able to live according to its nature (e.g., perform natural behaviors that are thought to be important to it, such as grazing)? We review examples, primarily from our own research, showing how all 3 questions can be addressed using science. For example, we review work showing 1) how common diseases such as lameness can be better identified and prevented through improvements in the ways cows are housed and managed, 2) how pain caused by dehorning of dairy calves can be reduced, and 3) how environmental conditions affect cow preferences for indoor housing versus pasture. Disagreements about animal welfare can occur when different measures are used. For example, management systems that favor production may restrict natural behavior or can even lead to higher rates of disease. The best approaches are those that address all 3 types of concerns, for example, feeding systems for calves that allow expression of key behaviors (i.e., sucking on a teat), that avoid negative affect (i.e., hunger), and that allow for improved functioning (i.e., higher rates of body weight gain, and ultimately higher milk production).
动物功能是否良好(如健康状况良好、生产力高等等),动物感觉是否良好(如没有疼痛等等),以及动物是否能够按照其天性生活(如表现出被认为对其重要的自然行为,如吃草)?我们主要回顾来自我们自己研究的例子,展示如何利用科学解决所有这三个问题。例如,我们回顾的研究表明:1)通过改善奶牛的饲养和管理方式,如何能更好地识别和预防诸如跛足等常见疾病;2)如何减少给奶牛犊去角造成的疼痛;3)环境条件如何影响奶牛对室内饲养和牧场的偏好。当采用不同的衡量标准时,可能会出现关于动物福利的分歧。例如,有利于生产的管理系统可能会限制自然行为,甚至可能导致更高的疾病发生率。最好的方法是那些能解决所有这三种类型问题的方法,例如,犊牛饲养系统要能让关键行为得以表现(即吸吮乳头),避免负面影响(即饥饿),并能促进功能改善(即更高的体重增加率,最终实现更高的产奶量)。