Suppr超能文献

欧洲自动挤奶的利弊。

Pros and cons of automatic milking in Europe.

作者信息

Svennersten-Sjaunja K M, Pettersson G

机构信息

Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Kungsängen Research Centre, SE-753 23 Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2008 Mar;86(13 Suppl):37-46. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0527. Epub 2007 Nov 12.

Abstract

During the last several decades, new milking management systems have been introduced, of which development of automatic milking (AM) systems is a significant step forward. In Europe, AM has become an established management system and has shown to be much more than milking management. Factors such as milking, milk quality, feeding, cow traffic, grazing, and animal behavior are essential elements of AM. This system offers possibilities for more frequent milking and can be adapted to lactational stage. Increased milk yield with AM has been observed, but lack of increased production has also been reported from the field, probably due to less attention paid to the total management system. The AM system provides consistent milking routines, with those for teat stimulation and feeding during milking giving an adequate oxytocin release and milk ejection. Initially, reduced milk quality, such as increased FFA, total bacteria count, and somatic cell count (SCC), was observed. Increased FFA could be due to increased milking frequency or handling of the milk, although this has not yet been determined. The elevated total bacteria count was probably due to mismanagement because later studies indicated that teat cleaning in AM is sufficient to reduce spores and dirt on the teats. Significant positive effects on udder health and teat treatment were observed in some studies, possibly as an effect of quarter milking, a procedure whereby an individual teat cup is detached when milk flow is below the preset level for detachment. Well-functioning cow traffic is a prerequisite for successful AM system performance to obtain an optimal number of visits to the feeding area and the milking parlor for all cows. Technical stoppages in the AM system (i.e., the milking unit) increased milk SCC, and the variation and length of the milking interval seem to contribute to elevated SCC. Grazing is a common management routine in many countries. Different ways to motivate the cows to visit the milking parlor, such as shorter distance between barn and pasture, supplement feeding, access to water, and use of acoustic signals, have been tested. It was concluded that use of AM and grazing systems together is possible as long as the distance from the milking parlor to pasture is short. With proper management routines, it is possible to achieve a production level and animal well-being in AM systems that are at least as good as in conventional milking systems.

摘要

在过去几十年里,引入了新的挤奶管理系统,其中自动挤奶(AM)系统的发展是向前迈出的重要一步。在欧洲,AM已成为一种既定的管理系统,并且已证明其作用远不止于挤奶管理。挤奶、牛奶质量、饲喂、奶牛通行、放牧和动物行为等因素是AM的基本要素。该系统提供了更频繁挤奶的可能性,并且可以根据泌乳阶段进行调整。已观察到使用AM可提高产奶量,但也有实地报告称产量没有增加,这可能是由于对整个管理系统关注较少。AM系统提供一致的挤奶程序,其中挤奶期间的乳头刺激和饲喂程序可促使催产素充分释放并实现排乳。最初,观察到牛奶质量下降,如游离脂肪酸(FFA)增加、总细菌数增加和体细胞计数(SCC)增加。FFA增加可能是由于挤奶频率增加或牛奶处理不当,尽管尚未确定原因。总细菌数升高可能是由于管理不善,因为后来的研究表明,AM中的乳头清洁足以减少乳头表面的孢子和污垢。一些研究观察到对乳房健康和乳头处理有显著的积极影响,这可能是由于逐个乳头挤奶的效果,即当奶流低于预设的脱开水平时,单个乳头杯会脱开。良好的奶牛通行是AM系统成功运行的前提条件,以便所有奶牛都能以最佳次数前往饲喂区和挤奶厅。AM系统(即挤奶单元)中的技术故障会增加牛奶SCC,并且挤奶间隔的变化和时长似乎会导致SCC升高。放牧是许多国家常见的管理方式。人们已经测试了多种促使奶牛前往挤奶厅的方法,例如缩短牛舍与牧场之间的距离、补充饲喂、提供饮水以及使用声音信号。得出的结论是,只要挤奶厅到牧场的距离较短,就可以同时使用AM和放牧系统。通过适当的管理程序,在AM系统中有可能实现至少与传统挤奶系统一样好的生产水平和动物福利。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验