Landon Center on Aging, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Jan;24(1):52-61. doi: 10.1177/1545968309341646. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
Unilateral middle cerebral artery infarction has been reported to impair bilateral hand grasp.
Individuals (5 males and 5 females; age 33-86 years) with chronic unilateral middle cerebral artery stroke (4 right lesions and 6 left lesions) repeatedly lifted a 260-g object. Participants were then trained to lift the object using visuomotor feedback via an oscilloscope that displayed their actual grip force (GF) and a target GF, which roughly matched the physical properties of the object.
The subjects failed to accurately modulate the predictive GF when relying on somatosensory information from the previous lifts. Instead, for all the lifts, they programmed excessive GF equivalent to the force used for the first lift. The predictive GF was lowered for lifts following the removal of the visual feedback. The mean difference in predictive GF between the lifts before and after visual training was significant (4.35 +/- 0.027 N; P <or= .001; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.80-4.88). After removal of visual feedback, there was also a significant mean difference in the applied predictive GF between the "early" and "late" lifts (0.78 +/- 0.029 N; P <or= .006; 95% CI = 0.22-1.35), demonstrating continued increase in predictive GF accuracy.
Predictive or feedforward fingertip force generation is impaired in the ipsilesional hand when lifting a novel object with precision grip. Reacquisition of the motor forces for the grasp of objects is possible after stroke. Potentially, retraining grasp control for the ipsilesional hand may translate to improved function and motor learning within the contralesional hand.
已有研究报道单侧大脑中动脉梗死可损害双侧手抓握。
本研究纳入慢性单侧大脑中动脉梗死患者(5 男 5 女,年龄 33-86 岁),他们反复提起 260g 重物。然后,通过示波镜上显示的实际握力(GF)和目标 GF 对参与者进行基于视觉运动反馈的训练,目标 GF 与物体的物理特性大致匹配。
当依赖于先前提起重物的体感信息时,参与者无法准确调节预测性 GF。相反,在所有提起中,他们都设定了过高的 GF,相当于第一次提起时使用的力。在去除视觉反馈后,预测性 GF 降低。视觉训练前后预测性 GF 的平均差异具有统计学意义(4.35 +/- 0.027 N;P <or=.001;95%置信区间 [CI] = 3.80-4.88)。去除视觉反馈后,“早期”和“晚期”提起之间的应用预测性 GF 也存在显著的平均差异(0.78 +/- 0.029 N;P <or=.006;95% CI = 0.22-1.35),表明预测性 GF 准确性持续提高。
在使用精确抓握提起新物体时,对侧手的预测性或前馈指尖力产生受损。在中风后,可能重新获得对物体抓握的运动力。对于患侧手的抓握控制进行重新训练可能会转化为对健侧手的功能改善和运动学习。