Cilia M, Fish T, Yang X, McLaughlin M, Thannhauser T W, Gray S
USDA, ARS, Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
J Biomol Tech. 2009 Sep;20(4):201-15.
Protein extraction methods can vary widely in reproducibility and in representation of the total proteome, yet there are limited data comparing protein isolation methods. The methodical comparison of protein isolation methods is the first critical step for proteomic studies. To address this, we compared three methods for isolation, purification, and solubilization of insect proteins. The aphid Schizaphis graminum, an agricultural pest, was the source of insect tissue. Proteins were extracted using TCA in acetone (TCA-acetone), phenol, or multi-detergents in a chaotrope solution. Extracted proteins were solubilized in a multiple chaotrope solution and examined using 1-D and 2-D electrophoresis and compared directly using 2-D Difference Gel Electrophoresis (2-D DIGE). Mass spectrometry was used to identify proteins from each extraction type. We were unable to ascribe the differences in the proteins extracted to particular physical characteristics, cell location, or biological function. The TCA-acetone extraction yielded the greatest amount of protein from aphid tissues. Each extraction method isolated a unique subset of the aphid proteome. The TCA-acetone method was explored further for its quantitative reliability using 2-D DIGE. Principal component analysis showed that little of the variation in the data was a result of technical issues, thus demonstrating that the TCA-acetone extraction is a reliable method for preparing aphid proteins for a quantitative proteomics experiment. These data suggest that although the TCA-acetone method is a suitable method for quantitative aphid proteomics, a combination of extraction approaches is recommended for increasing proteome coverage when using gel-based separation techniques.
蛋白质提取方法在可重复性和总蛋白质组的代表性方面可能有很大差异,但比较蛋白质分离方法的数据有限。蛋白质分离方法的系统比较是蛋白质组学研究的第一步关键步骤。为了解决这个问题,我们比较了三种昆虫蛋白质的分离、纯化和溶解方法。农业害虫麦二叉蚜是昆虫组织的来源。使用丙酮中的三氯乙酸(TCA-丙酮)、苯酚或在离液剂溶液中的多种去污剂提取蛋白质。提取的蛋白质溶解在多种离液剂溶液中,使用一维和二维电泳进行检测,并直接使用二维差异凝胶电泳(2-D DIGE)进行比较。使用质谱法鉴定每种提取类型的蛋白质。我们无法将提取的蛋白质差异归因于特定的物理特征、细胞位置或生物学功能。TCA-丙酮提取法从蚜虫组织中获得的蛋白质产量最高。每种提取方法都分离出蚜虫蛋白质组的一个独特子集。使用2-D DIGE进一步探索了TCA-丙酮法的定量可靠性。主成分分析表明,数据中的变化很少是技术问题导致的,因此表明TCA-丙酮提取法是一种为定量蛋白质组学实验制备蚜虫蛋白质的可靠方法。这些数据表明,虽然TCA-丙酮法适用于定量蚜虫蛋白质组学,但当使用基于凝胶的分离技术时,建议结合多种提取方法以增加蛋白质组覆盖范围。