• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

倾向得分方法在精神病学研究中的应用。

The use of propensity score methods in psychiatric research.

作者信息

VanderWeele Tyler

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2006 Jun;15(2):95-103. doi: 10.1002/mpr.183.

DOI:10.1002/mpr.183
PMID:19722290
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6878374/
Abstract

The use of propensity score methods has become increasing widespread in public health, in medicine and in many other settings involving research with observational studies. The methods provide a useful and straightforward way of simultaneously controlling for many variables that potentially confound the relationship between a specific outcome and the treatment or exposure under study. The methods assist the researcher in avoiding certain dangers in more traditional regression modelling and, in the case of binary outcomes, allow for the control of a greater number of potential confounders. The use of propensity score techniques has been fairly limited in psychiatry, largely to studies of health care delivery and use. An introduction to propensity score methods is given and a series of examples illustrating their use in psychiatric research is presented.

摘要

倾向得分方法在公共卫生、医学以及许多其他涉及观察性研究的领域中使用得越来越广泛。这些方法提供了一种有用且直接的方式,可同时控制许多可能混淆特定结果与所研究的治疗或暴露之间关系的变量。这些方法有助于研究人员避免传统回归建模中存在的某些风险,并且在二元结果的情况下,能够控制更多潜在的混杂因素。倾向得分技术在精神病学中的应用相当有限,主要用于医疗保健服务与使用方面的研究。本文介绍了倾向得分方法,并给出了一系列说明其在精神病学研究中应用的示例。

相似文献

1
The use of propensity score methods in psychiatric research.倾向得分方法在精神病学研究中的应用。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2006 Jun;15(2):95-103. doi: 10.1002/mpr.183.
2
Developing and comparing methods for measuring the content of care in mental health services.开发和比较测量心理健康服务中护理内容的方法。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011 Mar;46(3):219-29. doi: 10.1007/s00127-010-0192-4. Epub 2010 Feb 14.
3
A measurement feedback system (MFS) is necessary to improve mental health outcomes.测量反馈系统(MFS)对于改善心理健康结果是必要的。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;47(10):1114-9. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181825af8. Epub 2009 Aug 21.
4
Propensity Score Methods: Theory and Practice for Anesthesia Research.倾向评分方法:麻醉研究的理论与实践。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Oct;127(4):1074-1084. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002920.
5
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
6
Investigation of the effectiveness of psychiatric interventions on the mental health of pregnant women in Kashan City - Iran: A clinical trial study.伊朗卡尚市精神干预对孕妇心理健康效果的调查:一项临床试验研究。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2019 Dec;46:79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.09.036. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
7
Factors Associated with Long-Stays in an Italian Psychiatric Intensive Treatment Facility: 1-Year Retrospective Observational Analysis.与意大利精神病强化治疗设施中长期住院相关的因素:1 年回顾性观察分析。
Psychiatr Q. 2019 Mar;90(1):185-196. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9616-1.
8
Five Steps to Successfully Implement and Evaluate Propensity Score Matching in Clinical Research Studies.成功实施和评估临床研究中倾向评分匹配的五个步骤。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Oct;127(4):1066-1073. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002787.
9
The Utility of Outpatient Commitment: I. A Need for Treatment and a Least Restrictive Alternative to Psychiatric Hospitalization.门诊承诺的实用性:I. 治疗的必要性和精神住院的最低限制替代方案。
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Dec 1;68(12):1247-1254. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600161. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
10
Comparison of propensity score methods for pre-specified subgroup analysis with survival data.倾向评分法在生存数据分析中预定亚组分析的比较。
J Biopharm Stat. 2020 Jul 3;30(4):734-751. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2020.1730868. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Calibrated and Conformal Propensity Scores for Causal Effect Estimation.用于因果效应估计的校准共形倾向得分
Uncertain Artif Intell. 2024 Jul;2024:1083-1111. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
2
Impact of young adult life transitions on adult mental health problems: a propensity score analysis.青年期生活转变对成人心理健康问题的影响:一项倾向得分分析。
Psychol Med. 2025 May 19;55:e152. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725001072.
3
Transgender body image: Weight dissatisfaction, objectification & identity - Complex interplay explored via matched group.跨性别者的身体形象:体重不满、客体化与身份认同——通过匹配组探索复杂的相互作用
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024 Jan-Mar;24(1):100441. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100441. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
4
Coping with the mental health impact of COVID-19: A study protocol for a multinational longitudinal study on coping and resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic.应对 COVID-19 对心理健康的影响:一项关于 COVID-19 大流行期间应对和恢复力的跨国纵向研究方案。
PLoS One. 2023 May 18;18(5):e0285803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285803. eCollection 2023.
5
Instrumental variable-based high-dimensional mediation analysis with unmeasured confounders for survival data in the observational epigenetic study.基于工具变量的高维中介分析,用于观察性表观遗传学研究中存在未测量混杂因素的生存数据。
Front Genet. 2023 Feb 2;14:1092489. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1092489. eCollection 2023.
6
Do "Real World" Childhood Mental Health Services Reduce Risk for Adult Psychiatric Disorders?“现实世界”中的儿童心理健康服务是否能降低成人精神障碍的风险?
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Aug;61(8):1041-1049.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2021.12.014. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
7
High-Dimensional Mediation Analysis With Confounders in Survival Models.生存模型中含混杂因素的高维中介分析
Front Genet. 2021 Jun 28;12:688871. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.688871. eCollection 2021.
8
China Stroke Statistics 2019: A Report From the National Center for Healthcare Quality Management in Neurological Diseases, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, the Chinese Stroke Association, National Center for Chronic and Non-communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention and Institute for Global Neuroscience and Stroke Collaborations.中国卒中报告 2019:国家医疗质量管理与控制中心神经系统疾病专家委员会,国家神经系统疾病临床医学研究中心,中国卒中学会,国家心血管病中心,中国疾病预防控制中心,全球神经科学与卒中协作组织联合报告。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2020 Sep;5(3):211-239. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000457. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
9
Methodological comments: McFarlane et al.方法学评论:麦克法兰等人
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Jan;41(1):20-1. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu139. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
10
Drawing causal inferences using propensity scores: a practical guide for community psychologists.使用倾向评分进行因果推断:社区心理学家的实用指南。
Am J Community Psychol. 2013 Dec;52(3-4):380-92. doi: 10.1007/s10464-013-9604-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Matching With Doses in an Observational Study of a Media Campaign Against Drug Abuse.在一项反对药物滥用的媒体宣传活动观察性研究中匹配剂量
J Am Stat Assoc. 2001 Dec;96(456):1245-1253. doi: 10.1198/016214501753381896.
2
Bounding causal effects under uncontrolled confounding using counterfactuals.使用反事实方法在未控制混杂因素的情况下界定因果效应。
Epidemiology. 2005 Jul;16(4):548-55. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000166500.23446.53.
3
Sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounding assuming a marginal structural model for repeated measures.采用重复测量的边际结构模型对未测量的混杂因素进行敏感性分析。
Stat Med. 2004 Mar 15;23(5):749-67. doi: 10.1002/sim.1657.
4
Propensity score modeling strategies for the causal analysis of observational data.用于观察性数据因果分析的倾向评分建模策略。
Biostatistics. 2002 Jun;3(2):179-93. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/3.2.179.
5
Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders.事件数量较少且存在多个混杂因素时逻辑回归与倾向得分的比较。
Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Aug 1;158(3):280-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg115.
6
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four treatment modalities for substance disorders: a propensity score analysis.物质障碍四种治疗方式的有效性和成本效益:倾向得分分析
Health Serv Res. 2003 Feb;38(1 Pt 1):233-59. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00114.
7
Outcomes of homeless adults with mental illness in a housing program and in case management only.仅参与住房项目和个案管理的患有精神疾病的无家可归成年人的结局。
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Jan;54(1):78-83. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.1.78.
8
Outcomes and sample selection: the case of a homelessness and substance abuse intervention.结果与样本选择:一项针对无家可归与药物滥用干预措施的案例
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2002 May;55(Pt 1):63-91. doi: 10.1348/000711002159707.
9
Estimating causal effects.估计因果效应。
Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Apr;31(2):422-9.
10
A comparison of youth referred to psychiatric emergency services: police versus other sources.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2002;30(1):74-80.