Piangprach Thanabodi, Hengtrakool Chanothai, Kukiattrakoon Boonlert, Kedjarune-Leggat Ureporn
Section of Dental Public Health, Nonthai Hospital, Nakorn Ratchasima, Thailand.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Sep;140(9):1137-43. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0341.
Saliva, tooth experiences and tooth position may be associated with dental erosion. To identify factors that may provide a potential protective effect against erosion, the authors compared salivary factors and behavioral aspects in participants in three age groups.
The authors evaluated 79 volunteer participants in three age groups: 16 through 20 years, 26 through 30 years and 46 through 50 years. They classified all teeth as having no erosion, having erosion involving only enamel or having erosion involving dentin on at least one surface. They collected saliva from each participant and determined pH, flow rate, buffering capacity, urea, total protein and volume required to neutralize orange juice.
Unstimulated salivary buffering capacity and urea concentration in salivary samples of participants aged 16 through 20 years with no erosion (facial/buccal surface) were significantly greater than those in the group with enamel erosion (P < .05). In participants aged 26 through 30 years (occlusal surface), the stimulated salivary flow rate was higher in the group with enamel erosion than in the group with dentin erosion (P < .05). In the group aged 46 through 50 years (lingual and palatal surfaces), only stimulated salivary total protein was significantly higher in the group with enamel erosion (P < .05). In groups aged 16 through 20 years and 46 through 50 years, erosion appeared to be related to a preference for sour (acidic) tastes (P < .05).
Saliva protects enamel and dentin from erosion. Its effectiveness in this role depends partly on salivary factors and may differ according to a person's age and to the severity and site of erosion.
Salivary factors including flow rate, urea, buffering capacity and neutralization capability help prevent dental erosion. The protective level of saliva varies by age and tooth experiences.
唾液、牙齿经历和牙齿位置可能与牙侵蚀有关。为了确定可能对侵蚀具有潜在保护作用的因素,作者比较了三个年龄组参与者的唾液因素和行为方面。
作者评估了79名志愿者参与者,分为三个年龄组:16至20岁、26至30岁和46至50岁。他们将所有牙齿分类为无侵蚀、仅釉质有侵蚀或至少一个表面有牙本质侵蚀。他们从每个参与者收集唾液,并测定pH值、流速、缓冲能力、尿素、总蛋白以及中和橙汁所需的体积。
16至20岁无侵蚀(面部/颊面)参与者的唾液样本中,未刺激唾液缓冲能力和尿素浓度显著高于釉质侵蚀组(P <.05)。在26至30岁(咬合面)参与者中,釉质侵蚀组的刺激唾液流速高于牙本质侵蚀组(P <.05)。在46至50岁组(舌面和腭面)中,仅釉质侵蚀组的刺激唾液总蛋白显著更高(P <.05)。在16至20岁组和46至50岁组中,侵蚀似乎与对酸味(酸性)口味的偏好有关(P <.05)。
唾液保护釉质和牙本质免受侵蚀。其在该作用中的有效性部分取决于唾液因素,并且可能因个体年龄以及侵蚀的严重程度和部位而异。
包括流速、尿素、缓冲能力和中和能力在内的唾液因素有助于预防牙侵蚀。唾液的保护水平因年龄和牙齿经历而异。