Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜子宫骶神经切除术缓解慢性盆腔疼痛:一项随机对照试验

Laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation for alleviating chronic pelvic pain: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Daniels Jane, Gray Richard, Hills Robert K, Latthe Pallavi, Buckley Laura, Gupta Janesh, Selman Tara, Adey Elizabeth, Xiong Tengbin, Champaneria Rita, Lilford Richard, Khan Khalid S

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, University of Birmingham, Metchley Park Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TG UK.

出版信息

JAMA. 2009 Sep 2;302(9):955-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1268.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Chronic pelvic pain is a common condition with a major effect on health-related quality of life, work productivity, and health care use. Operative interruption of nerve trunks in the uterosacral ligaments by laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation (LUNA) is a treatment option for patients with chronic pelvic pain.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of LUNA in patients with chronic pelvic pain.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized controlled trial of 487 women with chronic pelvic pain lasting longer than 6 months without or with minimal endometriosis, adhesions, or pelvic inflammatory disease, who were recruited to the study by consultant gynecological surgeons from 18 UK hospitals between February 1998 and December 2005. Follow-up was conducted by questionnaires mailed at 3 and 6 months and at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years.

INTERVENTION

Bilateral LUNA or laparoscopy without pelvic denervation (no LUNA); participants were blinded to the treatment allocation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was pain, which was assessed by a visual analogue scale. Data concerning the 3 types of pain (noncyclical pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia) were analyzed separately as was the worst pain level experienced from any of these 3 types of pain. The secondary outcome was health-related quality of life, which was measured using a generic instrument (EuroQoL EQ-5D and EQ-VAS).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 69 months, there were no significant differences reported on the visual analogue pain scales for the worst pain (mean difference between the LUNA group and the no LUNA group, -0.04 cm [95% confidence interval {CI}, -0.33 to 0.25 cm]; P = .80), noncyclical pain (-0.11 cm [95% CI, -0.50 to 0.29 cm]; P = .60), dysmenorrhea (-0.09 cm [95% CI, -0.49 to 0.30 cm]; P = .60), or dyspareunia (0.18 cm [95% CI, -0.22 to 0.62 cm]; P = .40). No differences were observed between the LUNA group and the no LUNA group for quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Among women with chronic pelvic pain, LUNA did not result in improvements in pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, or quality of life compared with laparoscopy without pelvic denervation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

controlled-trials.com Identifier: ISRCTN41196151.

摘要

背景

慢性盆腔疼痛是一种常见病症,对健康相关生活质量、工作效率和医疗保健利用有重大影响。腹腔镜子宫骶骨神经切断术(LUNA)通过手术切断子宫骶骨韧带中的神经干,是慢性盆腔疼痛患者的一种治疗选择。

目的

评估LUNA对慢性盆腔疼痛患者的疗效。

设计、设置和参与者:一项随机对照试验,纳入487名慢性盆腔疼痛持续超过6个月、无或有轻度子宫内膜异位症、粘连或盆腔炎的女性。这些女性由英国18家医院的妇科顾问外科医生于1998年2月至2005年12月招募入组。通过在3个月、6个月以及1年、2年、3年和5年邮寄问卷进行随访。

干预措施

双侧LUNA或不进行盆腔去神经支配的腹腔镜检查(无LUNA);参与者对治疗分配不知情。

主要结局指标

主要结局为疼痛,通过视觉模拟量表进行评估。分别分析了三种疼痛类型(非周期性疼痛、痛经和性交痛)的数据以及这三种疼痛类型中经历的最严重疼痛程度。次要结局为健康相关生活质量,使用通用工具(欧洲五维度健康量表EQ-5D和EQ-VAS)进行测量。

结果

中位随访69个月后,在视觉模拟疼痛量表上,LUNA组和无LUNA组在最严重疼痛方面(LUNA组与无LUNA组的平均差异为-0.04 cm [95%置信区间{CI},-0.33至0.25 cm];P = 0.80)、非周期性疼痛方面(-0.11 cm [95% CI,-0.50至0.29 cm];P = 0.60)、痛经方面(-0.09 cm [95% CI,-0.49至0.30 cm];P = 0.60)或性交痛方面(0.18 cm [95% CI,-0.22至0.62 cm];P = 0.40)均无显著差异。LUNA组和无LUNA组在生活质量方面也未观察到差异。

结论

在慢性盆腔疼痛女性中,与不进行盆腔去神经支配的腹腔镜检查相比,LUNA在疼痛、痛经、性交痛或生活质量方面并未带来改善。

试验注册

controlled-trials.com标识符:ISRCTN41196151。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验