Allahqoli Leila, Hakimi Sevil, Momenimovahed Zohre, Mazidimoradi Afrooz, Rezaei Fatemeh, Aghamohammadi Seyedeh Zahra, Rahmani Azam, Mansouri Ghazal, Hadavandsiri Fatemeh, Salehiniya Hamid, Alkatout Ibrahim
Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran 14357-13715, Iran.
Faculty of Health Sciences, Ege University, 35575 Izmir, Türkiye.
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 9;13(16):4676. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164676.
: Despite the availability of treatments such as surgery and hormonal therapy, women with endometriosis often endure chronic problems. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of neuropelveology. : In a systematic review with a meta-analysis, we searched three electronic databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science (WOS). The search was conducted in January 2024 with no date or language restrictions using a carefully curated set of keywords. We conducted a comprehensive review, including all observational and clinical trials reporting data on neuropelveology approaches in the management of endometriosis, irrespective of geographical location. The studies included in our review were required to be published in peer-reviewed journals and be available in any language, with at least an abstract in English. The data of all included studies were summarized in excel (version 19) and were analyzed by Comprehensive Meta-analysis v3.3 (Biostat) and STATA (version 17). A multilevel meta-analysis was performed on studies with two arms (intervention and control) to evaluate the efficacy of neuropelveology in managing women with endometriosis. : After screening 476 records, 30 studies, published from 1952 to 2021, were included in this review, each employing various methodologies. The studies were divided into the following three categories: (a) efficacy of neurectomy or nerve resection ( = 20), (b) efficacy of neurolysis (nerve blocks) ( = 4), and (c) efficacy of neuromodulation ( = 6) in the management of endometriosis. Among the studies evaluating the efficacy of neurectomy or nerve resection, 10 studies (with 18 group comparisons) were included in the random-effects meta-analysis. Treatment success (not occurrence of pain) was higher with neurectomy vs. controls (RR = 0.497, 95% CI = 0.236 to 1.04, = 0.06 (for experimental studies) and RR = 0.248, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.43, < 0.001 (for observational studies)), representing a 50% and 75.2% risk reduction in the recurrence of pain in experimental and observational studies, respectively. Similarly, neurolysis, particularly superior hypogastric plexus blocks and uterine nerve ethanol neurolysis, demonstrated encouraging outcomes in pain reduction and an improved quality of life for women with endometriosis. The efficacy of neuromodulation in managing endometriosis symptoms appears promising but requires further investigation. : In conclusion, neuropelveology approaches, such as neurectomy, neurolysis, and neuromodulation, offer significant potential for pain reduction in endometriosis patients, albeit with risks of complications and high recurrence rates, necessitating careful patient selection and long-term monitoring.
尽管有手术和激素治疗等手段,但子宫内膜异位症女性常常忍受着慢性问题。本综述旨在评估神经盆腔学的有效性和安全性。
在一项带有荟萃分析的系统综述中,我们检索了三个电子数据库:MEDLINE(PubMed)、Scopus、Embase和Web of Science(WOS)。检索于2024年1月进行,没有日期或语言限制,使用了精心挑选的一组关键词。我们进行了全面综述,纳入所有报告神经盆腔学方法在子宫内膜异位症管理中数据的观察性和临床试验,无论地理位置如何。我们综述中纳入的研究要求发表在同行评审期刊上,且可用任何语言,至少有英文摘要。所有纳入研究的数据在excel(19版)中汇总,并通过Comprehensive Meta-analysis v3.3(Biostat)和STATA(17版)进行分析。对有两个组(干预组和对照组)的研究进行了多层次荟萃分析,以评估神经盆腔学在管理子宫内膜异位症女性中的疗效。
在筛选了476条记录后,本综述纳入了1952年至2021年发表的30项研究,每项研究采用了不同的方法。这些研究分为以下三类:(a)神经切除术或神经切除的疗效(n = 20),(b)神经松解术(神经阻滞)的疗效(n = 4),以及(c)神经调节的疗效(n = 6)在子宫内膜异位症管理中的情况。在评估神经切除术或神经切除疗效的研究中,10项研究(有18组比较)纳入了随机效应荟萃分析。与对照组相比,神经切除术的治疗成功率(无疼痛发生)更高(RR = 0.497,95%CI = 0.236至1.04,P = 0.06(实验性研究);RR = 0.248,95%CI = 0.14至0.43,P < 0.001(观察性研究)),分别表示实验性研究和观察性研究中疼痛复发风险降低了50%和75.2%。同样,神经松解术,特别是上腹下丛阻滞和子宫神经乙醇神经松解术,在减轻疼痛和改善子宫内膜异位症女性生活质量方面显示出令人鼓舞的结果。神经调节在管理子宫内膜异位症症状方面的疗效似乎很有前景,但需要进一步研究。
总之,神经盆腔学方法,如神经切除术、神经松解术和神经调节,在降低子宫内膜异位症患者疼痛方面具有显著潜力,尽管存在并发症风险和高复发率,需要仔细选择患者并进行长期监测。