Safety of Nanomaterials Interdisciplinary Research Centre, Institute of Occupational Medicine, Research Avenue North, Riccarton, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK.
J R Soc Interface. 2010 Feb 6;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S119-29. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0252.focus. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
New developments in technology usually entail some hazard as well as advantage to a society. Hazard of a material translates into risk by exposure of humans and/or their environment to the agent in question, and risk is reduced by control of exposure, usually guided by regulation based on understanding of the mechanisms of harm. We illustrate risks relating to the causation of diseases associated with exposure to aerosols of combustion particles and asbestos, leading to paradigms of particle toxicity, and discuss analogies with potential exposure to manufactured nanoparticles (NPs). We review the current understanding of the hazard of NPs derived from the new science of nanotoxicology and the limited research to date into human exposure to these particles. We identify gaps in knowledge relating to the properties of NPs that might determine toxicity and in understanding the most appropriate ways both to measure this in the laboratory and to assess it in the workplace. Nevertheless, we point out that physical principles governing the behaviour of such particles allow determination of practical methods of protecting those potentially exposed. Finally, we discuss the early steps towards regulation and the difficulties facing regulators in controlling potentially harmful exposures in the absence of sufficient scientific evidence.
新技术的发展通常会给社会带来一些危害和益处。物质的危害通过人类和/或他们的环境暴露于有关物质而转化为风险,风险通过暴露控制来降低,通常是基于对伤害机制的理解进行监管。我们举例说明了与接触燃烧颗粒和石棉气溶胶导致的疾病有关的风险,这些风险导致了颗粒毒性的范例,并讨论了与潜在暴露于人造纳米颗粒(NPs)的类比。我们回顾了从纳米毒理学这一新科学中得出的关于 NPs 危害的现有认识,以及迄今为止对人类接触这些颗粒的有限研究。我们确定了与可能决定毒性的 NPs 特性有关的知识空白,并了解了在实验室中测量和在工作场所评估这种毒性的最合适方法。然而,我们指出,控制这些颗粒行为的物理原理允许确定保护那些潜在暴露于这些颗粒的实用方法。最后,我们讨论了朝着监管方向迈出的早期步骤,以及在缺乏充分科学证据的情况下,监管机构在控制潜在有害暴露方面面临的困难。