• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区治疗令:超越医院利用率——探讨社区治疗令与社区参与和支持性住房的关联。

Community treatment orders: beyond hospital utilization rates examining the association of community treatment orders with community engagement and supportive housing.

机构信息

Carleton University, Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2009 Dec;45(6):415-9. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9203-x. Epub 2009 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1007/s10597-009-9203-x
PMID:19728089
Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the association of community treatment orders (CTO) with community engagement and housing arrangements for one population of psychiatric patients in Ontario, Canada. Socio demographic characteristics and health service utilization information were collected for each patient placed on a CTO during a 3 year period. Information was collected for each of the 84 patients when a CTO was first issued and then updated to reflect both the patient's ongoing involvement with the legislation and related clinical outcomes. A significant increase in the number of community services and a shift to supportive housing arrangements was found for patients following issuance of a CTO.

摘要

本文旨在探讨加拿大安大略省一类精神科患者的社区治疗令(CTO)与社区参与和住房安排之间的关联。在三年期间,为每位接受 CTO 的患者收集了社会人口统计学特征和卫生服务利用信息。在首次发出 CTO 时收集了 84 名患者中的每一位的信息,然后进行更新以反映患者与立法的持续参与情况和相关临床结果。发岀 CTO 后,发现患者接受的社区服务数量显著增加,并且向支持性住房安排转变。

相似文献

1
Community treatment orders: beyond hospital utilization rates examining the association of community treatment orders with community engagement and supportive housing.社区治疗令:超越医院利用率——探讨社区治疗令与社区参与和支持性住房的关联。
Community Ment Health J. 2009 Dec;45(6):415-9. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9203-x. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
2
Community treatment orders in Western Switzerland: A retrospective epidemiological study.瑞士西部的社区治疗令:一项回顾性流行病学研究。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Nov-Dec;67:101509. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101509. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
3
Why are community treatment orders controversial?为什么社区治疗令会引发争议?
Can J Psychiatry. 2004 Sep;49(9):579-84. doi: 10.1177/070674370404900902.
4
What determines compulsory community treatment? A logistic regression analysis using linked mental health and offender databases.是什么决定了强制社区治疗?一项使用关联心理健康和罪犯数据库的逻辑回归分析。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2004 Aug;38(8):613-8. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2004.01429.x.
5
Community treatment orders: profile of a Canadian experience.社区治疗令:加拿大的经验概况
Can J Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;50(1):27-30. doi: 10.1177/070674370505000106.
6
The utility of outpatient commitment: acute medical care access and protecting health.门诊承诺的实用性:急性医疗保健的可及性和保护健康。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018 Jun;53(6):597-606. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1510-5. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
7
Changes in determinants of compulsory community treatment over 11 years. A population-based analysis of linked mental health databases.11 年间强制性社区治疗决定因素的变化。基于人群的精神卫生数据库关联分析。
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Dec 15;230(2):400-5. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.09.027. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
8
Support in housing: a comparison between people with psychiatric disabilities and people with intellectual disabilities.住房支持:精神残疾人和智力残疾人的比较。
Community Ment Health J. 2009 Dec;45(6):420-6. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9225-4.
9
Value of community treatment orders remains at issue.社区治疗令的价值仍存在争议。
CMAJ. 2010 May 18;182(8):E337-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3237. Epub 2010 Apr 19.
10
A qualitative analysis of the use of community treatment orders in Saskatchewan.对萨斯喀彻温省社区治疗令使用情况的定性分析。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):516-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.06.001. Epub 2006 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Canadian Studies on the Effectiveness of Community Treatment Orders: An Updated Systematic Review of Quantitative Data: Études canadiennes sur l'efficacité des ordonnances de traitement en milieu communautaire : mise à jour d'un examen systématique des données quantitatives.加拿大社区治疗令有效性研究:定量数据的最新系统综述:加拿大关于社区治疗令有效性的研究:定量数据系统综述的更新
Can J Psychiatry. 2025 May 15:7067437251339215. doi: 10.1177/07067437251339215.
2
Expert opinions on improving coercion data collection across Europe: a concept mapping study.欧洲范围内改善强制数据收集的专家意见:一项概念映射研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 May 29;15:1403094. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1403094. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Community treatment orders in Toronto: the emerging data.多伦多的社区治疗令:新出现的数据。
Can J Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;52(10):647-56. doi: 10.1177/070674370705201005.
2
A cluster analysis of people on Community Treatment Orders in Victoria, Australia.澳大利亚维多利亚州接受社区治疗令人员的聚类分析。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):469-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.07.001. Epub 2006 Nov 3.
3
A qualitative analysis of the use of community treatment orders in Saskatchewan.对萨斯喀彻温省社区治疗令使用情况的定性分析。
Health resource utilization and cost before versus after initiation of second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics among adults with schizophrenia in Alberta, Canada: a retrospective, observational single-arm study.
在加拿大阿尔伯塔省,针对精神分裂症成年人,在开始使用第二代长效注射抗精神病药物前后的健康资源利用和成本:一项回顾性、观察性、单臂研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 2;22(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04075-y.
4
Hospital Utilization Outcomes Following Assignment to Outpatient Commitment.门诊承诺分配后的医院利用结果。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 Nov;48(6):942-961. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01112-y. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
5
Protecting Health and Safety with Needed-Treatment: the Effectiveness of Outpatient Commitment.以必要治疗保护健康和安全:门诊承诺的效力。
Psychiatr Q. 2022 Mar;93(1):55-79. doi: 10.1007/s11126-020-09876-6. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
6
The utility of outpatient civil commitment: Investigating the evidence.门诊民事强制收治的效用:证据调查。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 May-Jun;70:101565. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101565. Epub 2020 May 23.
7
Community Treatment Orders and Other Forms of Mandatory Outpatient Treatment.社区治疗令及其他形式的强制性门诊治疗。
Can J Psychiatry. 2019 May;64(5):356-374. doi: 10.1177/0706743719845906.
8
Compulsory community treatment to reduce readmission to hospital and increase engagement with community care in people with mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.强制社区治疗以减少精神疾病患者再次入院并提高其对社区护理的参与度:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;5(12):1013-1022. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30382-1. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
9
Systematic Review of Quantitative Measures of Stakeholder Engagement.利益相关者参与度定量测量的系统评价
Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Sep;10(5):314-336. doi: 10.1111/cts.12474. Epub 2017 May 29.
10
Associations between compulsory community treatment and continuity of care in a three year follow-up of the Oxford Community Treatment Order Trial (OCTET) cohort.牛津社区治疗令试验(OCTET)队列三年随访中强制社区治疗与连续护理之间的关联。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 28;17(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1319-x.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):516-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.06.001. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
4
The utility of extended outpatient civil commitment.延长门诊民事强制治疗的效用。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):525-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.09.001. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
5
Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders.对严重精神障碍患者的强制社区治疗和非自愿门诊治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20(3):CD004408. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004408.pub2.
6
Assessing Kendra's Law: five years of outpatient commitment in New York.
Psychiatr Serv. 2005 Jul;56(7):791-2. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.7.791.
7
Effects of compulsory treatment orders on time to hospital readmission.
Psychiatr Serv. 2005 Jul;56(7):867-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.7.867.
8
Community treatment orders: profile of a Canadian experience.社区治疗令:加拿大的经验概况
Can J Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;50(1):27-30. doi: 10.1177/070674370505000106.
9
Involuntary outpatient commitment, community treatment orders, and assisted outpatient treatment: what's in the data?非自愿门诊治疗、社区治疗令和辅助门诊治疗:数据中有什么?
Can J Psychiatry. 2004 Sep;49(9):585-91. doi: 10.1177/070674370404900903.
10
Why are community treatment orders controversial?为什么社区治疗令会引发争议?
Can J Psychiatry. 2004 Sep;49(9):579-84. doi: 10.1177/070674370404900902.