Department of Ophthalmology, Gangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Glaucoma. 2010 Apr-May;19(4):229-36. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181b21e87.
To compare the ability of Stratus optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT) and scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensator (GDx VCC) in recognizing a localized retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defect identified on red-free fundus photography.
Fifty-three patients with only 1 localized RNFL defect in either eye were taken RNFL thickness analysis using Stratus OCT and GDx VCC. Thirty-nine healthy subjects were used as controls and only 1 eye per subject was considered. Using red-free photography as the standard reference test, sensitivity and specificity for photographic defects, and topographic correlation with photographic defects were compared between Stratus OCT (sector average graph) and GDx VCC (deviation from normal map). Abnormal sectors at P<5% compared with their internal normative database were evaluated.
After excluding eyes with unacceptable scan images, 38 healthy eyes and 47 glaucomatous eyes were finally included. Stratus OCT and GDx VCC showed moderate sensitivity (78.7%) and high specificity (94.7% and 89.5%, respectively), and there was no significant difference (P=1.00 and P=0.69, respectively). RNFL defects determined by Stratus OCT and GDx VCC were correlated well with photographic RNFL defects in terms of peripapillary localization and clock-hour size, and there was no significant difference between 2 imaging devices (P=0.20 and P=0.27, respectively).
In recognizing a localized RNFL defect, overall diagnostic performance of Stratus OCT and GDx VCC with regard to their internal normative database was not significantly different. As both Stratus OCT and GDx VCC showed only moderate sensitivity, these imaging devices may not substitute red-free fundus photography in clinical practice of glaucoma diagnosis.
比较 Stratus 光学相干断层扫描仪(Stratus OCT)和扫描激光偏振仪与可变角膜补偿器(GDx VCC)在识别眼底自发荧光照片上定位的视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)局部缺损的能力。
对 53 例患者的 53 只眼仅出现 1 处局部 RNFL 缺损,采用 Stratus OCT 和 GDx VCC 进行 RNFL 厚度分析。39 例健康受试者作为对照,每只眼只考虑 1 只眼。以眼底自发荧光照片为标准参考测试,比较 Stratus OCT(扇形平均图)和 GDx VCC(偏离正常图)在摄影缺陷的敏感性和特异性,以及与摄影缺陷的地形图相关性。与内部正常数据库相比,评估异常扇区 P<5%。
排除不可接受的扫描图像后,最终纳入 38 只健康眼和 47 只青光眼眼。Stratus OCT 和 GDx VCC 显示出中等的敏感性(分别为 78.7%和 89.5%)和高特异性(分别为 94.7%和 89.5%),差异无统计学意义(P=1.00 和 P=0.69)。Stratus OCT 和 GDx VCC 确定的 RNFL 缺损与眼底自发荧光照片上的 RNFL 缺损在视盘周围定位和时钟小时大小方面相关性良好,两种成像设备之间无显著差异(P=0.20 和 P=0.27)。
在识别局部性 RNFL 缺损方面,Stratus OCT 和 GDx VCC 基于其内部正常数据库的整体诊断性能无显著差异。由于 Stratus OCT 和 GDx VCC 的敏感性均仅为中等,因此这些成像设备在青光眼诊断的临床实践中可能无法替代眼底自发荧光照片。