Department of Respiratory Diseases Research, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2009 Sep 4;4(9):e6897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006897.
Group A Streptococcus pyogenes (GAS) exhibits a high degree of clinically relevant phenotypic diversity. Strains vary widely in terms of antibiotic resistance (AbR), clinical severity, and transmission rate. Currently, strain identification is achieved by emm typing (direct sequencing of the genomic segment coding for the antigenic portion of the M protein) or by multilocus genotyping methods. Phenotype analysis, including critical AbR typing, is generally achieved by much slower and more laborious direct culture-based methods.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We compare genotype identification (by emm typing and PCR/ESI-MS) with directly measured phenotypes (AbR and outbreak associations) for 802 clinical isolates of GAS collected from symptomatic patients over a period of 6 years at 10 military facilities in the United States. All independent strain characterization methods are highly correlated. This shows that recombination, horizontal transfer, and other forms of reassortment are rare in GAS insofar as housekeeping genes, primary virulence and antibiotic resistance determinants, and the emm gene are concerned. Therefore, genotyping methods offer an efficient way to predict emm type and the associated AbR and virulence phenotypes.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The data presented here, combined with much historical data, suggest that emm typing assays and faster molecular methods that infer emm type from genomic signatures could be used to efficiently infer critical phenotypic characteristics based on robust genotype: phenotype correlations. This, in turn, would enable faster and better-targeted responses during identified outbreaks of constitutively resistant or particularly virulent emm types.
化脓性链球菌(GAS)表现出高度的临床相关表型多样性。菌株在抗生素耐药性(AbR)、临床严重程度和传播率方面差异很大。目前,通过emm 分型(直接测序编码 M 蛋白抗原部分的基因组片段)或多位点基因分型方法来鉴定菌株。表型分析,包括关键的 AbR 分型,通常通过更慢且更繁琐的直接基于培养的方法来实现。
方法/主要发现:我们将基因型鉴定(通过 emm 分型和 PCR/ESI-MS)与直接测量的表型(AbR 和暴发关联)进行比较,这些表型来自 6 年来美国 10 个军事设施的 802 例有症状患者的临床分离株。所有独立的菌株特征鉴定方法高度相关。这表明,重组、水平转移和其他形式的重排在 GAS 中很少见,因为管家基因、主要毒力和抗生素耐药决定因素以及 emm 基因都是如此。因此,基因分型方法提供了一种有效的方法来预测 emm 型及其相关的 AbR 和毒力表型。
结论/意义:这里呈现的数据,结合大量历史数据,表明 emm 分型检测和更快的分子方法,这些方法可以从基因组特征推断出 emm 型,可用于根据稳健的基因型-表型相关性,有效地推断出关键的表型特征。反过来,这将使在确定的具有固有耐药性或特别毒力的 emm 型的暴发期间,能够更快地做出更有针对性的反应。