Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 220/221, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Pathol Oncol Res. 2010 Mar;16(1):119-23. doi: 10.1007/s12253-009-9201-x.
Although invasion of the visceral pleura (VPI) by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a TNM-relevant diagnostic criterion and is known to affect the patients' prognoses, until recently there were no standardized or internationally accepted guidelines. This resulted in a diagnostic ambiguity leading to different tumor staging systems and to hardly comparable patient collectives in research studies world wide. The major problem in this issue is to exactly define what constitutes for the diagnosis of VPI with respect to anatomical landmarks.
In order to address this problem we investigated the pleural infiltration depth of 173 NSCLC specimens without lymph node metastases and proven tumor-related death using elastic stains and a scoring system referring to prominent pleural elastic layers, the lamina elastica externa and interna, as anatomical landmarks.
Performing comparative Kaplan-Meier survival analyses for each patient collective we could not find any significant difference in the patients' survival. This indicates that a differential evaluation of the tumor infiltration depth according to the elastic layers is not practicable.
Our findings support the consequent application of the recently proposed, pragmatic approach of the international staging committee for lung cancer (IASLC) to define an internationally accepted and standardized staging system for VPI.
尽管非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)侵犯内脏胸膜(VPI)是与 TNM 相关的诊断标准,并且已知会影响患者的预后,但直到最近,还没有标准化或国际公认的指南。这导致了诊断上的模糊性,导致了不同的肿瘤分期系统,以及在全球范围内的研究中几乎无法比较的患者群体。在这个问题上的主要问题是,要准确地定义什么是构成 VPI 诊断的解剖学标志。
为了解决这个问题,我们使用弹性染色和参照突出的胸膜弹性层,即外弹性层和内弹性层的评分系统,研究了 173 例无淋巴结转移和证实与肿瘤相关的死亡的 NSCLC 标本的胸膜浸润深度。
对每个患者群体进行比较性 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析,我们在患者的生存中没有发现任何显著差异。这表明,根据弹性层对肿瘤浸润深度进行差异评估是不可行的。
我们的研究结果支持国际肺癌分期委员会(IASLC)最近提出的实用方法的一贯应用,以定义一个国际上可接受和标准化的 VPI 分期系统。