Department of Radiology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Radiol. 2021 May;22(5):829-839. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0955. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
To compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced radial T1-weighted gradient-echo 3-tesla (3T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) for the detection of visceral pleural surface invasion (VPSI). Visceral pleural invasion by non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can be classified into two types: PL1 (without VPSI), invasion of the elastic layer of the visceral pleura without reaching the visceral pleural surface, and PL2 (with VPSI), full invasion of the visceral pleura.
Thirty-three patients with pathologically confirmed VPSI by NSCLC were retrospectively reviewed. Multidetector CT and contrast-enhanced 3T MRI with a free-breathing radial three-dimensional fat-suppressed volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) pulse sequence were compared in terms of the length of contact, angle of mass margin, and arch distance-to-maximum tumor diameter ratio. Supplemental evaluation of the tumor-pleura interface (smooth versus irregular) could only be performed with MRI (not discernible on CT).
At the tumor-pleura interface, radial VIBE MRI revealed a smooth margin in 20 of 21 patients without VPSI and an irregular margin in 10 of 12 patients with VPSI, yielding an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F-score for VPSI detection of 91%, 83%, 95%, 91%, 91%, and 87%, respectively. The McNemar test and receiver operating characteristics curve analysis revealed no significant differences between the diagnostic accuracies of CT and MRI for evaluating the contact length, angle of mass margin, or arch distance-to-maximum tumor diameter ratio as predictors of VPSI.
The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced radial T1-weighted gradient-echo 3T MRI and CT were equal in terms of the contact length, angle of mass margin, and arch distance-to-maximum tumor diameter ratio. The advantage of MRI is its clear depiction of the tumor-pleura interface margin, facilitating VPSI detection.
比较对比增强径向 T1 加权梯度回波 3 特斯拉(3T)磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT)在检测内脏胸膜表面侵犯(VPSI)方面的诊断性能。非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的内脏胸膜侵犯可分为两种类型:PL1(无 VPSI),侵犯内脏胸膜的弹性层而未到达内脏胸膜表面,以及 PL2(有 VPSI),完全侵犯内脏胸膜。
回顾性分析了 33 例经病理证实为 NSCLC 所致 VPSI 的患者。比较了多层 CT 和对比增强 3T MRI ,后者采用自由呼吸径向三维脂肪抑制容积采集屏气检查(VIBE)脉冲序列,比较了接触长度、肿块边缘角度和拱形距离-最大肿瘤直径比。仅在 MRI 上才能对肿瘤-胸膜界面(光滑与不规则)进行补充评估(在 CT 上不可见)。
在肿瘤-胸膜界面,21 例无 VPSI 患者的径向 VIBE MRI 显示光滑边缘,12 例有 VPSI 患者的边缘显示不规则,VPSI 检测的准确率、敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和 F 评分分别为 91%、83%、95%、91%、91%和 87%。McNemar 检验和受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,CT 和 MRI 在评估接触长度、肿块边缘角度或拱形距离-最大肿瘤直径比作为 VPSI 预测指标的诊断准确性方面无显著差异。
在接触长度、肿块边缘角度和拱形距离-最大肿瘤直径比方面,对比增强径向 T1 加权梯度回波 3T MRI 和 CT 的诊断性能相当。MRI 的优势在于其清晰地描绘了肿瘤-胸膜界面边缘,有利于 VPSI 的检测。