Pellegrini Joseph, DeLoge Jon, Bennett John, Kelly Joseph
University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
AANA J. 2009 Aug;77(4):293-9.
Frequently, patients identified as high risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are treated prophylactically with intravenous (IV) ondansetron and postoperatively with IV promethazine. The purpose of this study was to determine if using an aromatic therapy of 70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) would be more effective than promethazine in resolution of breakthrough PONV symptoms in groups of high-risk patients administered prophylactic ondansetron. All subjects enrolled were identified as high risk for PONV, administered general anesthesia and a prophylactic antiemetic of 4 mg of IV ondansetron, and randomized to receive IPA or promethazine for treatment of breakthrough PONV Demographics, verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS) scores for nausea, time to 50% reduction in VNRS scores, and overall antiemetic and incidence of PONV were measured. The data for 85 subjects were included in analysis; no differences in demographic variables or baseline measurements were noted between groups. The IPA group reported a faster time to 50% reduction in VNRS scores and decreased overall antiemetic requirements. A similar incidence in PONV was noted between groups. Based on these findings, we recommend that inhalation of 70% IPA is an option for treatment of PONV in high-risk patients who have received prophylactic ondansetron.
通常,被确定为术后恶心呕吐(PONV)高风险的患者会在术前接受静脉注射昂丹司琼预防性治疗,并在术后接受静脉注射异丙嗪治疗。本研究的目的是确定在接受预防性昂丹司琼治疗的高风险患者组中,使用70%异丙醇(IPA)芳香疗法在缓解突破性PONV症状方面是否比异丙嗪更有效。所有入组的受试者均被确定为PONV高风险,接受全身麻醉并静脉注射4 mg昂丹司琼进行预防性止吐治疗,然后随机分组接受IPA或异丙嗪治疗突破性PONV。记录人口统计学数据、恶心的语言数字评定量表(VNRS)评分、VNRS评分降低50%所需的时间,以及总体止吐情况和PONV发生率。分析纳入了85名受试者的数据;两组之间在人口统计学变量或基线测量方面未发现差异。IPA组报告VNRS评分降低50%所需的时间更短,总体止吐需求减少。两组之间PONV的发生率相似。基于这些发现,我们建议对于接受预防性昂丹司琼治疗的高风险PONV患者,吸入70% IPA是一种治疗选择。