Radford Kennett D, Fuller Thomas N, Bushey Brent, Daniel Carole, Pellegrini Joseph E
Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA.
AANA J. 2011 Aug;79(4 Suppl):S69-74.
Patients identified as high risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are often treated prophylactically with intravenous (IV) ondansetron and an additional agent. Limited options exist for a second agent with no adverse effects. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if combining the prophylactic inhalation of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) vapors, an agent with no adverse effects, with IV ondansetron would be more effective than IV ondansetron alone in the prevention of PONV in high-risk patients. A total of 76 patients at high risk for PONV were randomized into control (n = 38) and experimental (n = 38) groups. All patients received IV ondansetron before emergence from general anesthesia. In addition, the experimental group inhaled IPA vapors before induction. Severity of PONV was measured using a 0 to 10 verbal numeric rating scale. Other measured variables included time to onset and incidence of PONV, 24-hour composite nausea score, and satisfaction with nausea control. No significant differences in demographics, surgical or anesthesia time, number of risk factors, severity or incidence of PONV, or satisfaction scores were noted. Prophylactic inhalation of IPA vapors in combination with IV ondansetron was no more efficacious than IV ondansetron alone in the prevention of PONV in a high-risk population.
被确定为术后恶心呕吐(PONV)高风险的患者通常会接受静脉注射昂丹司琼及另一种药物进行预防性治疗。作为第二种药物且无不良反应的选择有限。本研究的目的是确定将无不良反应的异丙醇(IPA)蒸汽预防性吸入与静脉注射昂丹司琼联合使用,在预防高风险患者PONV方面是否比单独使用静脉注射昂丹司琼更有效。总共76名PONV高风险患者被随机分为对照组(n = 38)和实验组(n = 38)。所有患者在全身麻醉苏醒前接受静脉注射昂丹司琼。此外,实验组在诱导前吸入IPA蒸汽。使用0至10的言语数字评定量表测量PONV的严重程度。其他测量变量包括PONV的发作时间和发生率、24小时综合恶心评分以及对恶心控制的满意度。在人口统计学、手术或麻醉时间、风险因素数量、PONV的严重程度或发生率或满意度评分方面未发现显著差异。在高风险人群中,预防性吸入IPA蒸汽与静脉注射昂丹司琼联合使用在预防PONV方面并不比单独使用静脉注射昂丹司琼更有效。