• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者安全事件学习反应衡量指标的制定。

Development of a measure of patient safety event learning responses.

机构信息

School of Health Policy & Management, Faculty of Health, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2009 Dec;44(6):2123-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01021.x. Epub 2009 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01021.x
PMID:19732166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2796318/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To define patient safety event (PSE) learning response and to provide preliminary validation of a measure of PSE learning response.

DATA SOURCES

Ten focus groups with front-line staff and managers, an expert panel, and cross-sectional survey data from patient safety officers in 54 general acute hospitals.

STUDY DESIGN

A mixed methods study to define a measure of learning responses to patient safety failures that is rooted in theory, expert knowledge, and organizational practice realities.

EXTRACTION METHODS

Learning response items developed from the literature were modified and validated in front-line staff and manager focus groups and by an expert panel and second group of external experts. Actual learning responses gleaned from survey data were examined using exploratory factor analyses and reliability analysis.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Unique learning response items were identified for minor, moderate, major events, and major near misses by an expert panel. A two-factor model of major event learning response was identified (factor 1=event analysis, factor 2=dissemination/communication of learnings). Organizations engage in greater learning responses following major events than less severe events and, for major events, organizations engage in more factor 1 responses than factor 2 learning responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Eleven to 13 items can measure learning responses to PSEs of differing severity. The items are feasible, grounded in theory, and reflect expert opinion as well as practice setting realities. The items have the potential for use to assess current practice in organizations and set future improvement goals.

摘要

目的

定义患者安全事件(PSE)学习反应,并对 PSE 学习反应的衡量方法进行初步验证。

资料来源

10 个一线工作人员和管理人员焦点小组、一个专家小组,以及 54 家综合急性医院的患者安全干事的横断面调查数据。

研究设计

一项混合方法研究,旨在定义一种根植于理论、专家知识和组织实践现实的衡量患者安全失败学习反应的方法。

提取方法

从文献中开发的学习反应项目在一线工作人员和管理人员焦点小组以及专家小组和第二组外部专家中进行了修改和验证。使用探索性因子分析和可靠性分析检查从调查数据中得出的实际学习反应。

主要发现

专家小组确定了轻微、中度、重大事件和重大未遂事件的独特学习反应项目。确定了重大事件学习反应的两因素模型(因素 1=事件分析,因素 2=学习的传播/沟通)。与不太严重的事件相比,组织在重大事件后会进行更多的学习反应,而且对于重大事件,组织在因素 1 反应上的投入比因素 2 学习反应更多。

结论

11 到 13 项可以衡量不同严重程度的 PSE 学习反应。这些项目切实可行,根植于理论,反映了专家意见和实践环境的现实。这些项目有可能用于评估组织中的当前实践,并设定未来的改进目标。

相似文献

1
Development of a measure of patient safety event learning responses.患者安全事件学习反应衡量指标的制定。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Dec;44(6):2123-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01021.x. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
2
The relationship between organizational leadership for safety and learning from patient safety events.组织安全领导力与从患者安全事件中学习之间的关系。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun;45(3):607-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01102.x. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
3
Categorizing errors and adverse events for learning: a provider perspective.从提供者角度对用于学习的错误和不良事件进行分类
Healthc Q. 2009;12 Spec No Patient:154-60. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2009.20984.
4
Evaluation of a survey tool to measure safety climate in Australian hospital pharmacy staff.评估一种用于测量澳大利亚医院药房工作人员安全氛围的调查工具。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Jul-Aug;13(4):789-795. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
5
Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data.患者安全事件报告能否用于比较医院安全性?对英国国家报告与学习系统数据的定量分析结果
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 9;10(12):e0144107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144107. eCollection 2015.
6
Assessment of Patient Safety Culture in Iranian Academic Hospitals: Strengths and Weaknesses.伊朗学术医院患者安全文化评估:优势与劣势。
J Patient Saf. 2018 Dec;14(4):213-226. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000199.
7
Hospital survey on patient safety culture in Sarawak General Hospital: A cross sectional study.砂拉越综合医院患者安全文化的医院调查:一项横断面研究。
Med J Malaysia. 2019 Oct;74(5):385-388.
8
[Creation and validation of a new in-house synthetic scale to measure patient safety culture].[一种用于衡量患者安全文化的新型内部综合量表的创建与验证]
J Healthc Qual Res. 2019 Jan-Feb;34(1):12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2018.12.001. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
9
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].[旨在评估医护人员对酒精依赖患者的知识、认知及实践情况的调查问卷的心理测量学特征]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9.
10
An intelligent algorithm for assessing patient safety culture and adverse events voluntary reporting using PCA and ANFIS.一种使用主成分分析(PCA)和自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)评估患者安全文化和不良事件自愿报告的智能算法。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2019;30(1):45-58. doi: 10.3233/JRS-180036.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient safety incidents in paediatric radiology: how to care for the professional?儿科放射学中的患者安全事件:如何关怀专业人员?
Pediatr Radiol. 2025 Mar;55(3):429-436. doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-06054-9. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
2
Barriers and facilitators to learn and improve through morbidity and mortality conferences: a qualitative study.通过发病率和死亡率会议学习和改进的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 12;7(11):e018833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018833.
3
Mixed methods in biomedical and health services research.生物医学与卫生服务研究中的混合方法
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Jan 1;6(1):119-23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967885.
4
The relationship between organizational leadership for safety and learning from patient safety events.组织安全领导力与从患者安全事件中学习之间的关系。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun;45(3):607-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01102.x. Epub 2010 Mar 10.

本文引用的文献

1
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
2
Categorizing errors and adverse events for learning: a provider perspective.从提供者角度对用于学习的错误和不良事件进行分类
Healthc Q. 2009;12 Spec No Patient:154-60. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2009.20984.
3
Advancing measurement of patient safety culture.推进患者安全文化的衡量。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Feb;44(1):205-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00908.x. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
4
Learning from adverse events and near misses.从不良事件和未遂失误中吸取教训。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Jan;13(1):3-5. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0693-6. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
5
Getting boards on board: engaging governing boards in quality and safety.让董事会参与进来:促使管理董事会关注质量与安全。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008 Apr;34(4):214-20. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34028-8.
6
Learning from preventable adverse events in health care organizations: development of a multilevel model of learning and propositions.从医疗保健机构中可预防的不良事件中学习:学习的多层次模型及命题的发展
Health Care Manage Rev. 2007 Oct-Dec;32(4):330-40. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000296790.39128.20.
7
Using a survey of incident reporting and learning practices to improve organisational learning at a cancer care centre.利用事件报告和学习实践调查来改善癌症护理中心的组织学习。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Oct;16(5):342-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.018754.
8
US and Canadian physicians' attitudes and experiences regarding disclosing errors to patients.美国和加拿大医生在向患者披露医疗差错方面的态度和经历。
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(15):1605-11. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.15.1605.
9
Enhancing patient safety through organizational learning: Are patient safety indicators a step in the right direction?通过组织学习提高患者安全:患者安全指标是否朝着正确方向迈出了一步?
Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug;41(4 Pt 2):1633-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00569.x.
10
Sensemaking of patient safety risks and hazards.对患者安全风险和危害的理解
Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug;41(4 Pt 2):1555-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00565.x.