Curry Leslie A, Krumholz Harlan M, O'Cathain Alicia, Plano Clark Vicki L, Cherlin Emily, Bradley Elizabeth H
Section of Health Policy and Administration, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Jan 1;6(1):119-23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967885.
Mixed methods studies, in which qualitative and quantitative methods are combined in a single program of inquiry, can be valuable in biomedical and health services research, where the complementary strengths of each approach can yield greater insight into complex phenomena than either approach alone. Although interest in mixed methods is growing among science funders and investigators, written guidance on how to conduct and assess rigorous mixed methods studies is not readily accessible to the general readership of peer-reviewed biomedical and health services journals. Furthermore, existing guidelines for publishing mixed methods studies are not well known or applied by researchers and journal editors. Accordingly, this paper is intended to serve as a concise, practical resource for readers interested in core principles and practices of mixed methods research. We briefly describe mixed methods approaches and present illustrations from published biomedical and health services literature, including in cardiovascular care, summarize standards for the design and reporting of these studies, and highlight four central considerations for investigators interested in using these methods.
混合方法研究是将定性和定量方法结合在一个单一的探究项目中,在生物医学和卫生服务研究中可能具有重要价值,因为每种方法的互补优势能够比单独使用任何一种方法更深入地洞察复杂现象。尽管科学资助者和研究者对混合方法的兴趣在不断增加,但同行评审的生物医学和卫生服务期刊的普通读者却难以获得关于如何进行和评估严格的混合方法研究的书面指导。此外,现有的关于发表混合方法研究的指南并不为研究人员和期刊编辑所熟知或应用。因此,本文旨在为对混合方法研究的核心原则和实践感兴趣的读者提供一份简洁实用的资源。我们简要描述混合方法,并展示已发表的生物医学和卫生服务文献中的实例,包括心血管护理方面的实例,总结这些研究的设计和报告标准,并强调对有兴趣使用这些方法的研究者的四个核心考量因素。