Suppr超能文献

从患者角度看待慢性疼痛的治疗结果。

Patient-centered perspective on treatment outcomes in chronic pain.

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2010 Jan;11(1):6-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00685.x. Epub 2009 Sep 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To define patient-determined success criteria for fibromyalgia and back pain treatment across four outcome domains: pain, fatigue, emotional distress, interference with daily activities.

DESIGN

Retrospective correlational clinical sample design.

SETTING

Tertiary care clinics at health science center.

PATIENTS

248 fibromyalgia patients and 52 back pain patients.

INTERVENTIONS

N/A.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient Centered Outcomes Questionnaire, measures of usual pain intensity and pain unpleasantness.

RESULTS

Overall, for treatment to be considered successful, fibromyalgia patients required pain levels of 3.30 (54% reduction), fatigue levels of 3.08 (60% reduction), distress levels of 2.49 (60% reduction), and interference levels of 2.67 (63% reduction). Comparatively, back pain patients required pain levels of 2.23 (58% reduction), fatigue levels of 2.29 (57% reduction), distress levels of 1.65 (67% reduction), and interference levels of 1.81 (68% reduction). Overall, both fibromyalgia and back pain patients did not expect to meet their criteria for success.

CONCLUSIONS

Results highlight the importance of assessing the patient's view of successful outcome. Both fibromyalgia and back pain patients appear to have stringent criteria for success that existing treatments are often unlikely to meet. Comparison across groups indicated fibromyalgia patients have higher usual levels of pain, fatigue, distress, and interference. Interestingly, fibromyalgia patients also require greater changes across domains in order to consider treatment successful, despite rating higher levels of pain, fatigue, distress, and interference as successful. Recognizing patients' success criteria and treatment expectations encourages discussion and development of individualized treatment goals, and wider implementation of individualized treatment for chronic-pain populations is encouraged.

摘要

目的

在四个结果领域(疼痛、疲劳、情绪困扰、日常活动干扰)定义纤维肌痛和腰痛治疗的患者确定的成功标准。

设计

回顾性相关临床样本设计。

设置

健康科学中心的三级护理诊所。

患者

248 例纤维肌痛患者和 52 例腰痛患者。

干预措施

无。

结果测量

以患者为中心的结果问卷,常用疼痛强度和疼痛不愉快程度的测量。

结果

总体而言,为了被认为治疗成功,纤维肌痛患者需要疼痛水平为 3.30(54%的减少),疲劳水平为 3.08(60%的减少),困扰水平为 2.49(60%的减少),干扰水平为 2.67(63%的减少)。相比之下,腰痛患者需要疼痛水平为 2.23(58%的减少),疲劳水平为 2.29(57%的减少),困扰水平为 1.65(67%的减少),干扰水平为 1.81(68%的减少)。总体而言,纤维肌痛和腰痛患者都没有达到成功的标准。

结论

结果强调了评估患者对成功结果的看法的重要性。纤维肌痛和腰痛患者似乎都有严格的成功标准,而现有的治疗方法往往不太可能满足这些标准。跨组比较表明,纤维肌痛患者的疼痛、疲劳、困扰和干扰的常用水平更高。有趣的是,尽管纤维肌痛患者将更高水平的疼痛、疲劳、困扰和干扰评为成功,但他们也需要在各个领域有更大的变化才能认为治疗成功。认识到患者的成功标准和治疗期望鼓励讨论和制定个性化的治疗目标,并鼓励更广泛地为慢性疼痛人群实施个性化治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验