Devulder J, Jacobs A, Richarz U, Wiggett H
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Clinic, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Br J Anaesth. 2009 Oct;103(4):576-85. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep253. Epub 2009 Sep 6.
There is little evidence that short-acting opioids as rescue medication for breakthrough pain is an optimal long-term treatment strategy in chronic non-malignant pain. We compared clinical studies of long-acting opioids that allowed short-acting opioid rescue medication with those that did not, to determine the impact of opioid rescue medication use on the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of chronic opioid therapy in patients with chronic non-malignant pain.
We searched MEDLINE (1950 to July 2006) and EMBASE (1974 to July 2006) using terms for chronic non-malignant pain and long-acting opioids. Independent review of the search results identified 48 studies that met the study selection criteria. The effect of opioid rescue medication on analgesic efficacy and the incidence of common opioid-related side-effects were analysed using meta-regression.
After adjusting for potentially confounding variables (study design and type of opioid), the difference in analgesic efficacy between the 'rescue' and the 'no rescue' studies was not significant, with regression coefficients close to 0 and 95% confidence intervals that excluded an effect of more than 18 points on a 0-100 scale in each case. There was also no significant difference between the 'rescue' and the 'no rescue' studies for the incidence of nausea, constipation, or somnolence in both the unadjusted and the adjusted analyses.
We found no evidence that rescue medication with short-acting opioids for breakthrough pain affects analgesic efficacy of long-acting opioids or the incidence of common opioid-related side-effects among chronic non-malignant pain patients.
几乎没有证据表明,使用短效阿片类药物作为爆发性疼痛的解救药物是慢性非恶性疼痛的最佳长期治疗策略。我们比较了允许使用短效阿片类药物解救的长效阿片类药物的临床研究与不允许使用的临床研究,以确定使用阿片类药物解救对慢性非恶性疼痛患者慢性阿片类药物治疗的镇痛效果和耐受性的影响。
我们使用慢性非恶性疼痛和长效阿片类药物的检索词,检索了MEDLINE(1950年至2006年7月)和EMBASE(1974年至2006年7月)。对检索结果进行独立审查,确定了48项符合研究选择标准的研究。使用meta回归分析阿片类药物解救对镇痛效果和常见阿片类药物相关副作用发生率的影响。
在对潜在混杂变量(研究设计和阿片类药物类型)进行调整后,“解救”研究和“非解救”研究在镇痛效果上的差异不显著,回归系数接近0,95%置信区间在每种情况下都排除了在0-100量表上超过18分的影响。在未调整和调整分析中,“解救”研究和“非解救”研究在恶心、便秘或嗜睡发生率方面也没有显著差异。
我们没有发现证据表明,使用短效阿片类药物作为解救药物治疗爆发性疼痛会影响长效阿片类药物的镇痛效果,或慢性非恶性疼痛患者中常见阿片类药物相关副作用的发生率。