• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖析快速自动命名(RAN)与阅读能力之间的关系。

Decomposing the relation between Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) and reading ability.

作者信息

Arnell Karen M, Joanisse Marc F, Klein Raymond M, Busseri Michael A, Tannock Rosemary

机构信息

Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada L2S 3A1.

出版信息

Can J Exp Psychol. 2009 Sep;63(3):173-84. doi: 10.1037/a0015721.

DOI:10.1037/a0015721
PMID:19739900
Abstract

The Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) test involves rapidly naming sequences of items presented in a visual array. RAN has generated considerable interest because RAN performance predicts reading achievement. This study sought to determine what elements of RAN are responsible for the shared variance between RAN and reading performance using a series of cognitive tasks and a latent variable modelling approach. Participants performed RAN measures, a test of reading speed and comprehension, and six tasks, which tapped various hypothesised components of the RAN. RAN shared 10% of the variance with reading comprehension and 17% with reading rate. Together, the decomposition tasks explained 52% and 39% of the variance shared between RAN and reading comprehension and between RAN and reading rate, respectively. Significant predictors suggested that working memory encoding underlies part of the relationship between RAN and reading ability.

摘要

快速自动命名(RAN)测试涉及快速说出视觉阵列中呈现的项目序列。RAN引起了相当大的兴趣,因为RAN表现可预测阅读成绩。本研究旨在通过一系列认知任务和潜在变量建模方法,确定RAN的哪些元素导致了RAN与阅读表现之间的共同方差。参与者进行了RAN测量、阅读速度和理解测试,以及六项任务,这些任务挖掘了RAN的各种假设组成部分。RAN与阅读理解的共同方差为10%,与阅读速度的共同方差为17%。分解任务分别解释了RAN与阅读理解之间以及RAN与阅读速度之间共同方差的52%和39%。显著的预测因素表明,工作记忆编码是RAN与阅读能力之间部分关系的基础。

相似文献

1
Decomposing the relation between Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) and reading ability.剖析快速自动命名(RAN)与阅读能力之间的关系。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2009 Sep;63(3):173-84. doi: 10.1037/a0015721.
2
Component processes subserving rapid automatized naming in dyslexic and non-dyslexic readers.服务于诵读困难和非诵读困难读者快速自动命名的成分过程。
Dyslexia. 2011 Aug;17(3):242-55. doi: 10.1002/dys.433.
3
The ABCs of computerized naming: equivalency, reliability, and predictive validity of a computerized rapid automatized naming (RAN) task.计算机化命名的基础要素:计算机化快速自动命名(RAN)任务的等效性、可靠性和预测效度。
J Neurosci Methods. 2006 Feb 15;151(1):30-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.07.014. Epub 2006 Jan 10.
4
What does rapid automatized naming measure? A new RAN task compared to naming and lexical decision.快速自动命名测量的是什么?一项新的快速自动命名任务与命名和词汇判断的比较。
Brain Lang. 2004 Jul-Sep;90(1-3):47-62. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00419-X.
5
An experimental comparison between rival theories of rapid automatized naming performance and its relationship to reading.快速自动命名表现的竞争理论之间的实验比较及其与阅读的关系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2007 Sep;98(1):46-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.04.003. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
6
Semantic context and visual feature effects in object naming: an fMRI study using arterial spin labeling.物体命名中的语义语境和视觉特征效应:一项使用动脉自旋标记的功能磁共振成像研究。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Aug;21(8):1571-83. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21114.
7
Rapid automatized naming, phonology and dyslexia in Polish children.波兰儿童的快速自动命名、语音学与阅读障碍
Med Sci Monit. 2009 Sep;15(9):CR460-9.
8
The influence of inattention and rapid automatized naming on reading performance.注意缺陷和快速自动命名对阅读表现的影响。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Apr;26(3):214-24. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acr014. Epub 2011 Mar 20.
9
Rapid automatized naming and immediate memory functions in Chinese Mandarin-speaking elementary readers.普通话母语的小学生的快速自动命名和即时记忆功能。
J Learn Disabil. 2010 Jan-Feb;43(1):48-61. doi: 10.1177/0022219409345016. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
10
Rapid automatized naming and immediate memory functions in Chinese children who read English as a second language.中国儿童在阅读英语作为第二语言时的快速自动命名和即时记忆功能。
J Learn Disabil. 2013 Jul-Aug;46(4):347-62. doi: 10.1177/0022219411424209. Epub 2011 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns of the left thalamus embedding into the connectome associated with reading skills in children with reading disabilities.阅读障碍儿童中与阅读技能相关的左侧丘脑嵌入脑连接组的模式。
Netw Neurosci. 2024 Dec 10;8(4):1507-1528. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00414. eCollection 2024.
2
Cognitive Predictors of the Overlap of Reading and Math in Middle School.中学阶段阅读与数学重叠的认知预测因素
Learn Individ Differ. 2024 Jan;109. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102400. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
3
Reading processes of public and private middle school and high school students.
公立和私立初中及高中学生的阅读过程。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2024 Apr 15;37(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41155-024-00296-0.
4
The Role of Verbal Fluency as a Variable in Reading and Comprehension Skills in Bengali.在孟加拉语的阅读和理解技能中,言语流畅性作为一个变量的作用。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2024 Feb 6;53(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10037-0.
5
Rapid Automatized Naming as a Universal Marker of Developmental Dyslexia in Italian Monolingual and Minority-Language Children.快速自动命名作为意大利单语和少数族裔语言儿童发育性阅读障碍的通用指标
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 7;13:783775. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.783775. eCollection 2022.
6
Developmental Trends of Visual Processing of Letters and Objects Using Naming Speed Tasks.使用命名速度任务对字母和物体进行视觉加工的发展趋势
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Dec 10;14:562712. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.562712. eCollection 2020.
7
Longitudinal Relationships Between Reading Abilities, Phonological Awareness, Language Abilities and Executive Functions: Comparison of Low Risk Preterm and Full-Term Children.阅读能力、语音意识、语言能力与执行功能之间的纵向关系:低风险早产儿与足月儿的比较
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 17;11:468. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00468. eCollection 2020.
8
Individual differences in reading: Separable effects of reading experience and processing skill.个体阅读差异:阅读经验和加工技能的可分离影响。
Mem Cognit. 2020 May;48(4):553-565. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00989-3.
9
Language processing fluency and verbal working memory in prelingually deaf long-term cochlear implant users: A pilot study.语前聋长期使用人工耳蜗者的语言处理流畅性和言语工作记忆:一项初步研究。
Cochlear Implants Int. 2018 Nov;19(6):312-323. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2018.1493970. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
10
Does the Relation between Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Depend on Age or on Reading Level? A Behavioral and ERP Study.快速自动命名与阅读之间的关系取决于年龄还是阅读水平?一项行为和事件相关电位研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Feb 22;12:73. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00073. eCollection 2018.