• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意缺陷和快速自动命名对阅读表现的影响。

The influence of inattention and rapid automatized naming on reading performance.

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Child Study Center, NY 10016, USA.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Apr;26(3):214-24. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acr014. Epub 2011 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1093/arclin/acr014
PMID:21422009
Abstract

The current study examined the relation between attention, rapid automatized naming (RAN), and reading fluency among typically developing children. A total of 104 third- and fourth-grade children (8-11 years of age) completed RAN measures consisting of four stimuli (letter, digit, color, and object) and an oral reading fluency measure from the Gray Oral Reading Test-Fourth Edition. Correlational and hierarchical regression analyses revealed that all four RAN stimuli, particularly letter RAN, were significant predictors of reading fluency. Additionally, parent and teacher ratings of inattention from the Swanson, Nolan and Pelham-Version Four rating scale predicted RAN after controlling for gender, working memory, and estimated IQ. Further analyses indicated that RAN performance mediated the relation between inattention and reading fluency. Results support the need to consider attentional variables when assessing reading performance, even among typically developing children.

摘要

本研究考察了正常发展儿童的注意力、快速自动命名(RAN)和阅读流畅性之间的关系。共有 104 名三、四年级儿童(8-11 岁)完成了 RAN 测试,测试内容包括四个刺激物(字母、数字、颜色和物体)和来自 Gray 阅读测试第四版的口头阅读流畅性测试。相关和层次回归分析表明,所有四个 RAN 刺激物,特别是字母 RAN,是阅读流畅性的重要预测因素。此外,在控制性别、工作记忆和估计智商后,来自斯旺森、诺兰和佩勒姆第四版评定量表的注意力不集中的家长和教师评定,也可以预测 RAN。进一步的分析表明,RAN 表现在注意力不集中和阅读流畅性之间的关系中起中介作用。研究结果支持在评估阅读表现时考虑注意力变量的必要性,即使是在正常发展的儿童中也是如此。

相似文献

1
The influence of inattention and rapid automatized naming on reading performance.注意缺陷和快速自动命名对阅读表现的影响。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Apr;26(3):214-24. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acr014. Epub 2011 Mar 20.
2
The ABCs of computerized naming: equivalency, reliability, and predictive validity of a computerized rapid automatized naming (RAN) task.计算机化命名的基础要素:计算机化快速自动命名(RAN)任务的等效性、可靠性和预测效度。
J Neurosci Methods. 2006 Feb 15;151(1):30-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.07.014. Epub 2006 Jan 10.
3
Why is rapid automatized naming related to reading?为什么快速自动命名与阅读有关?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 May;115(1):218-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.015. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
4
Decomposing the relation between Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) and reading ability.剖析快速自动命名(RAN)与阅读能力之间的关系。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2009 Sep;63(3):173-84. doi: 10.1037/a0015721.
5
Rapid automatized naming and immediate memory functions in Chinese Mandarin-speaking elementary readers.普通话母语的小学生的快速自动命名和即时记忆功能。
J Learn Disabil. 2010 Jan-Feb;43(1):48-61. doi: 10.1177/0022219409345016. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
6
Rapid automatized naming and immediate memory functions in Chinese children who read English as a second language.中国儿童在阅读英语作为第二语言时的快速自动命名和即时记忆功能。
J Learn Disabil. 2013 Jul-Aug;46(4):347-62. doi: 10.1177/0022219411424209. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
7
Rapid automatized naming (RAN) taps a mechanism that places constraints on the development of early reading fluency.快速自动命名(RAN)利用了一种对早期阅读流畅性发展施加限制的机制。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Aug;20(8):1040-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02405.x. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
8
Naming speed and visual search deficits in readers with disabilities: evidence from an orthographically regular language (Italian).残疾读者的命名速度和视觉搜索缺陷:来自正字法规则语言(意大利语)的证据。
Dev Neuropsychol. 2006;30(3):885-904. doi: 10.1207/s15326942dn3003_7.
9
Component processes subserving rapid automatized naming in dyslexic and non-dyslexic readers.服务于诵读困难和非诵读困难读者快速自动命名的成分过程。
Dyslexia. 2011 Aug;17(3):242-55. doi: 10.1002/dys.433.
10
Is rapid automatized naming related to reading and mathematics for the same reason(s)? A follow-up study from kindergarten to Grade 1.快速命名与阅读和数学是否因同样的原因有关?一项从幼儿园到 1 年级的后续研究。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Jul;115(3):481-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Intrinsic Cerebro-Cerebellar Functional Connectivity Reveals the Function of Cerebellum VI in Reading-Related Skills.脑内小脑功能连接揭示小脑VI区在阅读相关技能中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 20;11:420. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00420. eCollection 2020.
2
Variation in the speech signal as a window into the cognitive architecture of language production.言语信号的变化揭示了语言产生的认知结构。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):1973-2004. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1423-4.
3
Effective scheduling of looking and talking during rapid automatized naming.
快速自动命名过程中注视与言语的有效调度
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 May;42(5):742-60. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000171. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
4
Specific Learning Disorders and ADHD: Current Issues in Diagnosis Across Clinical and Educational Settings.特定学习障碍与注意力缺陷多动障碍:临床与教育环境中诊断的当前问题
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015 Jun;17(6):38. doi: 10.1007/s11920-015-0584-y.
5
Measuring what matters: effectively predicting language and literacy in children with cochlear implants.衡量重要因素:有效预测人工耳蜗植入儿童的语言和读写能力。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Aug;76(8):1148-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.04.024. Epub 2012 May 28.
6
Emergent literacy in kindergartners with cochlear implants.幼儿期人工耳蜗植入者的早期读写能力。
Ear Hear. 2012 Nov-Dec;33(6):683-97. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318258c98e.