Singer Murray
University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada R3T 2N2.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2009 Sep;63(3):185-92. doi: 10.1037/a0015387.
Singer presented evidence that reading time reflects, in part, processes of continuously verifying current clauses with reference to their text antecedents. This study extended that analysis to text ideas of indeterminate truth in their discourse context. For example, having read simply that Norm's house was destroyed, one might later read that Norm's cousin believed that Norm's house was destroyed by a fire. Research concerning people's reports of not knowing something suggested that the reading of clauses of indeterminate truth would be faster than for false or inconsistent clauses. In two experiments, target sentences varied in their truth, verb entailments, and use of negation with reference to their antecedents. Reading time for indeterminate targets was sometimes distinctly shorter and was never longer than for corresponding false targets. The effects were modulated by the entailments of factive and nonfactive main verbs and by negative expression. All of the conditions that were identical to ones of Singer (2006) replicated the former findings. It was concluded that encountering text ideas of indeterminate truth does not initiate protracted memory searches for comparable concepts.
辛格提出证据表明,阅读时间在一定程度上反映了根据前文不断验证当前子句的过程。本研究将该分析扩展到语篇语境中真值不确定的文本观点。例如,仅仅读到诺姆的房子被毁后,人们可能随后会读到诺姆的表弟认为诺姆的房子是被火灾毁掉的。关于人们报告不知道某些事情的研究表明,阅读真值不确定的子句比阅读错误或不一致的子句速度更快。在两项实验中,目标句子在真值、动词蕴含以及相对于其前文的否定使用方面存在差异。真值不确定的目标句子的阅读时间有时明显更短,且从不比相应的错误目标句子更长。这些效应受到叙实动词和非叙实动词的蕴含以及否定表达的调节。所有与辛格(2006年)的条件相同的情况都重现了之前的研究结果。研究得出结论,遇到真值不确定的文本观点不会引发对类似概念的长时间记忆搜索。