Sweeney John, Mitchell Duncan
Brookfield Health Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Oct;18(19):2754-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02889.x.
The aim of this paper is to provide an account of the early development of what was originally known as 'mental deficiency' nursing in the UK and Ireland.
After a brief review of research literature, it analyses key issues behind the development of a workforce positioned on the margins of nursing in the two jurisdictions through a comparative discussion of similarities and differences.
The paper draws on two doctoral studies that examined the development of intellectual disability nursing using an historiographical design.
Primary sources consulted included records of nursing regulatory bodies, national archives, Royal College of Psychiatrists, archives, nursing journals, individual institutional records in both jurisdictions.
In both countries, psychiatrists established early training programmes for nurses, although a nursing model was adopted to meet service needs in the 1950s.
However, the way in which this branch of nursing developed laid the foundation for tensions as to whether it is appropriately located within the discipline of nursing. Ireland's colonial past and postcolonial position, the role of the church, welfare systems and diverse socio-political drivers for change represent key differences between the two jurisdictions.
What eventually became known as learning or intellectual disability nursing poses a continued challenge for the profession as a whole in regard to its breadth, role and focus in working with marginalised groups in society. The paper considers the risks for UK and Irish intellectual disability nurses for marginalisation in nursing should they forge closer links to other disciplines concerned with common threads of disability, education or social care.
本文旨在阐述英国和爱尔兰最初被称为“智力缺陷”护理的早期发展情况。
在简要回顾研究文献后,通过对两个司法管辖区护理边缘群体发展背后的关键问题进行异同比较讨论来进行分析。
本文借鉴了两项博士研究,这些研究采用历史编纂设计考察了智力残疾护理的发展。
查阅的主要资料来源包括护理监管机构记录、国家档案馆、皇家精神病学院、档案馆、护理期刊以及两个司法管辖区的各机构记录。
在这两个国家,精神病医生都为护士设立了早期培训项目,不过在20世纪50年代采用了一种护理模式以满足服务需求。
然而,这一护理分支的发展方式为其是否应恰当地归属于护理学科这一问题埋下了矛盾根源。爱尔兰的殖民历史和后殖民地位、教会的作用、福利体系以及不同的社会政治变革驱动因素是两个司法管辖区之间的主要差异。
最终被称为学习或智力残疾护理的领域,在其广度、角色以及与社会边缘群体合作的重点方面,给整个专业领域带来了持续挑战。本文探讨了英国和爱尔兰智力残疾护士如果与关注残疾、教育或社会护理共同主题的其他学科建立更紧密联系,在护理领域面临被边缘化的风险。