Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Heart. 2010 Jan;96(1):19-26. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.172809. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
Anecdotal evidence suggests that transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is being used beyond pre-market label indications.
To assess the frequency and outcomes associated with "off-label" use of TAVI, we conducted a retrospective study, examining adherence to patient selection criteria in 63 patients undergoing implantation with the 18F CoreValve ReValving System (CRS). Label status (on-label vs off-label) was determined by following (1) inclusion/exclusion criteria indicated in the 18F CRS safety and efficacy trial and (2) a patient selection matrix indicating anatomical boundaries to guide patient selection. Off-label use was defined as the presence of at least one exclusion criterion or "non-acceptable" criteria based on the patient selection matrix.
Off-label implantation was identified in 42 patients (67%)-40% had one, 19% had two and 8% had three or more off-label criteria. Baseline demographics were similar between the groups except for a higher logistic EuroSCORE in the on-label group (19.8 (11.2) vs 14.5 (7.3), p = 0.029). There was no significant difference in the procedural success rates between the on-label and off-label groups (91% vs 95%, respectively, p = 0.47). The frequency of angiographic moderate-severe aortic regurgitation, post-implant dilatation or implantation of a second valve was also similar between the groups. At 30 days, the cumulative death rate was 10%; there were four deaths in the "on-label" and three deaths in the "off-label" group.
In this study we found that "off-label" implantation of the CRS was common. Further studies are needed to evaluate the consequences of "label status" for patients undergoing TAVI.
有传闻证据表明,经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的使用已经超出了上市前的标签适应证。
为了评估 TAVI 的“超适应证”使用的频率和结果,我们进行了一项回顾性研究,检查了在 63 例接受 18F CoreValve ReValving 系统(CRS)植入的患者中,患者选择标准的符合情况。标签状态(适应证内 vs 适应证外)通过以下两种方式确定:(1)18F CRS 安全性和疗效试验中包含/排除标准,以及(2)一个患者选择矩阵,该矩阵指明了指导患者选择的解剖学边界。适应证外使用定义为至少存在一个排除标准或基于患者选择矩阵的“不可接受”标准。
在 42 例患者(67%)中发现了适应证外植入-40%有 1 个,19%有 2 个,8%有 3 个或更多适应证外标准。除了适应证内组的逻辑 EuroSCORE 较高(19.8(11.2)vs 14.5(7.3),p = 0.029)外,两组的基线人口统计学特征相似。两组之间的手术成功率无显著差异(分别为 91%和 95%,p = 0.47)。两组之间的中度至重度主动脉瓣反流、植入后扩张或植入第二个瓣膜的发生率也相似。30 天时,累积死亡率为 10%;“适应证内”组有 4 例死亡,“适应证外”组有 3 例死亡。
在这项研究中,我们发现 CRS 的“适应证外”植入很常见。需要进一步研究来评估 TAVI 患者的“标签状态”的后果。