Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
PLoS One. 2009 Sep 16;4(9):e7056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007056.
While the use of probiotics to treat or prevent inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been proposed, to this point the clinical benefits have been limited. In this report we analyzed the immunological activity of three strains of Lactobacillus to predict their in vivo efficacy in protecting against experimental colitis.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We compared the immunological properties of Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB8826, L. rhamnosus GG (LGG), L. paracasei B21060 and pathogenic Salmonella typhimurium (SL1344). We studied the stimulatory effects of these different strains upon dendritic cells (DCs) either directly by co-culture or indirectly via conditioning of an epithelial intermediary. Furthermore, we characterized the effects of these strains in vivo using a Dextran sulphate sodium (DSS) model of colitis. We found that the three strains exhibited different abilities to induce inflammatory cytokine production by DCs with L. plantarum being the most effective followed by LGG and L. paracasei. L. paracasei minimally induced the release of cytokines, while it also inhibited the potential of DCs to both produce inflammatory cytokines (IL-12 and TNF-alpha) and to drive Th1 T cells in response to Salmonella. This effect on DCs was found under both direct and indirect stimulatory conditions - i.e. mediated by epithelial cells - and was dependent upon an as yet unidentified soluble mediator. When tested in vivo, L. plantarum and LGG exacerbated the development of DSS-induced colitis and caused the death of treated mice, while, conversely L. paracasei was protective.
We describe a new property of probiotics to either directly or indirectly inhibit DC activation by inflammatory bacteria. Moreover, some immunostimulatory probiotics not only failed to protect against colitis, they actually amplified the disease progression. In conclusion, caution must be exercised when choosing a probiotic strain to treat IBD.
虽然已经提出使用益生菌来治疗或预防炎症性肠病(IBD),但到目前为止,临床益处有限。在本报告中,我们分析了三种乳杆菌菌株的免疫活性,以预测它们在体内预防实验性结肠炎中的功效。
方法/主要发现:我们比较了植物乳杆菌 NCIMB8826、鼠李糖乳杆菌 GG(LGG)、副干酪乳杆菌 B21060 和致病性沙门氏菌 typhimurium(SL1344)的免疫特性。我们研究了这些不同菌株直接通过共培养或通过上皮中间物间接对树突状细胞(DC)的刺激作用。此外,我们使用葡聚糖硫酸钠(DSS)结肠炎模型在体内研究了这些菌株的作用。我们发现,三种菌株对 DC 产生炎症细胞因子的能力不同,植物乳杆菌的效果最好,其次是 LGG 和副干酪乳杆菌。副干酪乳杆菌最小程度地诱导细胞因子的释放,同时也抑制 DC 产生炎症细胞因子(IL-12 和 TNF-α)的潜力,并响应沙门氏菌驱动 Th1 T 细胞。这种对 DC 的影响在直接和间接刺激条件下都有发现 - 即通过上皮细胞介导 - 并且依赖于一种尚未确定的可溶性介质。在体内测试时,植物乳杆菌和 LGG 加剧了 DSS 诱导的结肠炎的发展,并导致治疗小鼠死亡,而相反,副干酪乳杆菌具有保护作用。
我们描述了益生菌的一种新特性,即直接或间接抑制炎症细菌对 DC 的激活。此外,一些免疫刺激益生菌不仅不能预防结肠炎,反而会加剧疾病的进展。因此,在选择用于治疗 IBD 的益生菌菌株时必须谨慎。