• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[慢性心房颤动是否应该用地高辛治疗?]

[Should chronic atrial fibrillation be treated with digoxin?].

作者信息

Garre K

机构信息

Astra-Gruppen A/S, Albertslund, Medicinsk afdeling.

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 1990 Aug 27;152(35):2475-8.

PMID:1976285
Abstract

For decades, atrial fibrillation was treated exclusively with digoxin. The introduction of Ca-antagonists and beta-blockers has, however, produced valuable alternatives as ventricular function can now be controlled both at rest and during exercise whereas, with digoxin, ventricular function could only be controlled at rest. This review deals with the etiology and electrophysiology of atrial fibrillation together with the effects of Ca-antagonists and beta-blockers on conduction and control of the heart rate during exercise. Documentation of the effects of the different drugs, separately and combined, in the treatment of atrial fibrillation during rest and exercise is presented. It is concluded that alteration in the therapeutic strategy appears reasonable in favour of a combination of digoxin and also Ca-antagonists/beta-blocker.

摘要

几十年来,心房颤动一直仅用地高辛治疗。然而,钙拮抗剂和β受体阻滞剂的出现带来了有价值的替代药物,因为现在心室功能在静息和运动时都能得到控制,而使用地高辛时,心室功能只能在静息时得到控制。本文综述了心房颤动的病因和电生理学,以及钙拮抗剂和β受体阻滞剂在运动时对心脏传导和心率控制的影响。文中还介绍了不同药物单独及联合使用在静息和运动时治疗心房颤动的效果记录。得出的结论是,治疗策略的改变似乎是合理的,有利于地高辛与钙拮抗剂/β受体阻滞剂联合使用。

相似文献

1
[Should chronic atrial fibrillation be treated with digoxin?].[慢性心房颤动是否应该用地高辛治疗?]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1990 Aug 27;152(35):2475-8.
2
[Pharmacologic treatment of atrial fibrillation].[心房颤动的药物治疗]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2008 Oct;25(148):303-8.
3
Comparison of beta blocker and digoxin alone and in combination for management of patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure.β受体阻滞剂与地高辛单独及联合应用于房颤合并心力衰竭患者治疗的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Jan 15;103(2):248-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.09.064. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
4
Atrial fibrillation: drug therapies for ventricular rate control and restoration of sinus rhythm.心房颤动:控制心室率及恢复窦性心律的药物疗法
Geriatrics. 1998 Jun;53(6):46-8, 51-2, 54, 57-60.
5
Sotalol vs metoprolol for ventricular rate control in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation who have undergone digitalization: a single-blinded crossover study.索他洛尔与美托洛尔用于洋地黄化的慢性房颤患者心室率控制的单盲交叉研究。
Europace. 2001 Jan;3(1):73-9. doi: 10.1053/eupc.2000.0140.
6
Rate control at least as effective as rhythm control for AF patients.对于房颤患者,心率控制至少与节律控制一样有效。
Geriatrics. 2002 May;57(5):63.
7
Acute ventricular rate control in atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.
Int J Cardiol. 2004 Oct;97(1):7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.08.006.
8
Chronic pharmacologic therapy for atrial fibrillation and flutter.心房颤动和心房扑动的慢性药物治疗。
Med Health R I. 2004 Apr;87(4):104-7.
9
Chronic atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of medical heart rate control management.慢性心房颤动:医学心率控制管理的系统评价
Postgrad Med J. 2009 Jun;85(1004):303-12. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.068908.
10
Beta-blockers versus digoxin to control ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation.β受体阻滞剂与地高辛用于控制房颤时的心室率
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jun 7;45(11):1905-6; author reply 1906-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.015.