Comparison of analytical and inverse finite element approaches to estimate cell viscoelastic properties by micropipette aspiration.

The viscoelastic properties of cells are important in predicting cell deformation under mechanical loading and may reflect cell phenotype or pathological transition. Previous studies have demonstrated that viscoelastic parameters estimated by finite element (FE) analyses of micropipette aspiration (MA) data differ from those estimated by the analytical half-space model. However, it is unclear whether these differences are statistically significant, as previous studies have been based on average cell properties or parametric analyses that do not reflect the inherent experimental and biological variability of real experimental data. To determine whether cell material parameters estimated by the half-space model are significantly different from those predicted by the FE method, we implemented an inverse FE method to estimate the viscoelastic parameters of a population of primary porcine aortic valve interstitial cells tested by MA. We found that inherent differences between the analytical and inverse FE estimation methods resulted in statistically significant differences in individual cell properties. However, in cases with small pipette to cell radius ratios and short loading periods, model-dependent differences were masked by experimental and cell-to-cell variability. Analytical models that account for finite cell-size and loading rate further relaxed the experimental conditions for which accurate cell material parameter estimates could be obtained. These data provide practical guidelines for analysis of MA data that account for the wide range of conditions encountered in typical experiments.