• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Using a systems orientation and foundational theory to enhance theory-driven human service program evaluations.

作者信息

Wasserman Deborah L

机构信息

The Ohio State University Center for Family Research, COSI 333 West Broad Street, Columbus, OH 43209, USA.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2010 May;33(2):67-80. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.06.005
PMID:19765826
Abstract

This paper offers a framework for using a systems orientation and "foundational theory" to enhance theory-driven evaluations and logic models. The framework guides the process of identifying and explaining operative relationships and perspectives within human service program systems. Self-Determination Theory exemplifies how a foundational theory can be used to support the framework in a wide range of program evaluations. Two examples illustrate how applications of the framework have improved the evaluators' abilities to observe and explain program effect. In both exemplars improvements involved addressing and organizing into a single logic model heretofore seemingly disparate evaluation issues regarding valuing (by whose values); the role of organizational and program context; and evaluation anxiety and utilization.

摘要

相似文献

1
Using a systems orientation and foundational theory to enhance theory-driven human service program evaluations.
Eval Program Plann. 2010 May;33(2):67-80. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
2
Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis.项目理论评估:逻辑分析。
Eval Program Plann. 2011 Feb;34(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
3
Using a systems approach to evaluate the effectiveness of health service programs: the Health Care Facility Accreditation Program as an example.采用系统方法评估卫生服务项目的有效性:以医疗保健机构认证项目为例。
Aust Health Rev. 1988;11(3):165-81.
4
Tracking case management accountability: a systems approach.追踪病例管理问责制:一种系统方法。
J Case Manag. 1998 Fall;7(3):105-11.
5
Semi-structured interview protocol for constructing logic models.用于构建逻辑模型的半结构化访谈方案。
Eval Program Plann. 2007 Nov;30(4):339-50. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Aug 22.
6
Telehealth success: evaluation framework development.远程医疗的成功:评估框架的制定
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 2):1145-9.
7
Recent advances in explaining fertility declines in the third world.解释第三世界生育率下降的最新进展。
Comp Soc Res. 1984;7:155-77.
8
The role of theory in research to develop and evaluate the implementation of patient safety practices.理论在研究中的作用:开发和评估患者安全实践的实施。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 May;20(5):453-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.047993. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
9
Theoretical models for application in school health education research.用于学校健康教育研究的理论模型。
J Sch Health. 1984;54(6):39-49.
10
Combining case study research and systems theory as a heuristic model.将案例研究与系统理论相结合作为一种启发式模型。
Qual Health Res. 2007 Dec;17(10):1309-15. doi: 10.1177/1049732307308946.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Resilience and Mental Well-Being in Southwest Indigenous Nations and the Impact of COVID-19: Protocol for a Multimethods Study.了解美国西南部原住民的恢复力与心理健康以及新冠疫情的影响:一项多方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jul 13;12:e44727. doi: 10.2196/44727.
2
STEM education centers: catalyzing the improvement of undergraduate STEM education.
Int J STEM Educ. 2018;5(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0143-2. Epub 2018 Nov 12.