Suppr超能文献

项目理论评估:逻辑分析。

Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis.

作者信息

Brousselle Astrid, Champagne François

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences, Charles LeMoyne Hospital Research Center, University of Sherbrooke, Canada.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2011 Feb;34(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 Jun 11.

Abstract

Program theory evaluation, which has grown in use over the past 10 years, assesses whether a program is designed in such a way that it can achieve its intended outcomes. This article describes a particular type of program theory evaluation-logic analysis-that allows us to test the plausibility of a program's theory using scientific knowledge. Logic analysis is useful for improving the intervention or finding alternatives for achieving intended outcomes; it influences the choice of type of evaluation to conduct and strengthens the validity of subsequent evaluations. The objective of this article is to present the methodological principles and the roots of this type of program theory evaluation. We illustrate two types of logic analysis with two actual evaluation cases. There are very few published examples of program theory evaluation. This article will provide evaluators with both theoretical and practical information to help them in conceptualizing their evaluations.

摘要

项目理论评估在过去十年中应用日益广泛,它评估一个项目的设计方式是否能实现其预期成果。本文描述了一种特定类型的项目理论评估——逻辑分析,它使我们能够利用科学知识检验项目理论的合理性。逻辑分析有助于改进干预措施或寻找实现预期成果的替代方案;它影响评估类型的选择,并增强后续评估的有效性。本文的目的是介绍这类项目理论评估的方法原则及其根源。我们用两个实际评估案例说明了两种逻辑分析类型。已发表的项目理论评估实例非常少。本文将为评估人员提供理论和实践信息,以帮助他们构思评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验