• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科创新的评估与阶段

Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations.

作者信息

Barkun Jeffrey S, Aronson Jeffrey K, Feldman Liane S, Maddern Guy J, Strasberg Steven M, Altman Douglas G, Barkun Jeffrey S, Blazeby Jane M, Boutron Isabell C, Campbell W Bruce, Clavien Pierre-Alain, Cook Jonathan A, Ergina Patrick L, Flum David R, Glasziou Paul, Marshall John C, McCulloch Peter, Nicholl Jon, Reeves Bournaby C, Seiler Christoph M, Meakins Jonathan L, Ashby Deborah, Black Nick, Bunker John, Burton Martin, Campbell Marion, Chalkidou Kalipso, Chalmers Iain, de Leval Marc, Deeks Jon, Grant Adrian, Gray Muir, Greenhalgh Roger, Jenicek Milos, Kehoe Sean, Lilford Richard, Littlejohns Peter, Loke Yoon, Madhock Rajan, McPherson Kim, Rothwell Peter, Summerskill Bill, Taggart David, Tekkis Parris, Thompson Matthew, Treasure Tom, Trohler Ulrich, Vandenbroucke Jan

机构信息

McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1089-96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7
PMID:19782874
Abstract

Surgical innovation is an important part of surgical practice. Its assessment is complex because of idiosyncrasies related to surgical practice, but necessary so that introduction and adoption of surgical innovations can derive from evidence-based principles rather than trial and error. A regulatory framework is also desirable to protect patients against the potential harms of any novel procedure. In this first of three Series papers on surgical innovation and evaluation, we propose a five-stage paradigm to describe the development of innovative surgical procedures.

摘要

手术创新是外科实践的重要组成部分。由于与外科实践相关的特质,其评估很复杂,但却是必要的,这样手术创新的引入和采用才能基于循证原则,而非反复试验。还需要一个监管框架来保护患者免受任何新手术潜在危害的影响。在关于手术创新与评估的三篇系列论文中的第一篇里,我们提出一个五阶段范式来描述创新性手术程序的发展。

相似文献

1
Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations.外科创新的评估与阶段
Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1089-96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7.
2
[Difficult ot evaluate new surgical methods. IDEAL gives better control of surgical innovation and development].[难以评估新的手术方法。IDEAL能更好地把控手术创新与发展]
Lakartidningen. 2011;108(21):1178-9.
3
Adoption of new surgical technology.新外科技术的采用。
BMJ. 2006 Jan 14;332(7533):112-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7533.112.
4
Clinicians, decisions, and technology in the 21st century.21世纪的临床医生、决策与技术。
J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2000 Feb;18(1):1-2. doi: 10.1089/clm.2000.18.1.
5
Road Map For Diffusion Of Innovation In Health Care.医疗创新扩散路线图
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Feb;37(2):198-204. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1155.
6
Surgical innovation under scrutiny.接受审查的外科创新。
Lancet. 1993 Jul 24;342(8865):187-8.
7
Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation.评估手术创新的挑战。
Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1097-104. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61086-2.
8
The Use of Decision Analytic Modeling in the Evaluation of Surgical Innovations: A Scoping Review.决策分析模型在外科创新评估中的应用:范围综述。
Value Health. 2021 Jun;24(6):884-900. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.11.020. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
9
[Quality and innovation management in surgery for the patient's benefit].[以患者利益为导向的外科手术质量与创新管理]
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1997;114:872-9.
10
[Individuals and innovative techniques, ethical reflections on the progress of technology in surgery].[个体与创新技术:对外科手术技术进步的伦理思考]
Ann Chir. 2002 May;127(5):323-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3944(02)00766-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying and reporting modifications to surgical innovation: a systematic review of IDEAL/IDEAL-D studies.识别并报告手术创新的改进:对IDEAL/IDEAL-D研究的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 30;15(6):e097097. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097097.
2
IDEAL-Acu: A Methodological Framework for Evaluating the Effects of Acupuncture.IDEAL-Acu:一种评估针灸疗效的方法学框架
J Evid Based Med. 2025 Jun;18(2):e70043. doi: 10.1111/jebm.70043.
3
How pragmatic are randomised controlled trials evaluating minimally invasive surgery for oesophageal cancer? A methodological review of trial design using the Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary-2 (PRECIS-2) tool.
评估食管癌微创手术的随机对照试验有多实用?使用实用-解释性连续统指标总结-2(PRECIS-2)工具对试验设计进行的方法学综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e078417. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078417.
4
Lost in translation: the lack of agreement between surgeons and scientists regarding biomaterials research and innovation for treating bone defects.迷失在翻译中:外科医生和科学家在生物材料研究和治疗骨缺损创新方面缺乏共识。
BMC Med. 2024 Nov 6;22(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03734-z.
5
The training pathway for residents: 'Robotic Curriculum for young Surgeons' (RoCS) does not impair patient outcome during implementation into clinical routine.住院医师培训途径:“年轻外科医师机器人课程”(RoCS)在实施临床常规时不会影响患者预后。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Aug 6;18(1):307. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02056-9.
6
Evaluation of the suitability of using ArtiSential in various renal surgery: IDEAL stage 1 study.评估 ArtiSential 在各种肾脏手术中的适用性:IDEAL 阶段 1 研究。
BMC Urol. 2024 Aug 1;24(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01539-z.
7
Examining the application of the IDEAL framework in the reporting and evaluation of innovative invasive procedures: secondary qualitative analysis of a systematic review.检查 IDEAL 框架在创新性介入手术的报告和评估中的应用:系统评价的二次定性分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 24;14(5):e079654. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079654.
8
Assessment of Advanced Diagnostic Bronchoscopy Outcomes for Peripheral Lung Lesions: A Delphi Consensus Definition of Diagnostic Yield and Recommendations for Patient-centered Study Designs. An Official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians Research Statement.评估外周肺病变高级诊断性支气管镜检查的结果:诊断产量的德尔福共识定义和以患者为中心的研究设计建议。美国胸科学会/美国胸科学会研究声明的官方声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Mar 15;209(6):634-646. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202401-0192ST.
9
Surgeon views regarding the adoption of a novel surgical innovation into clinical practice: systematic review.外科医生对将新型手术创新引入临床实践的看法:系统评价。
BJS Open. 2024 Jan 3;8(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad141.
10
Availability of evidence and comparative effectiveness for surgical versus drug interventions: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.手术干预与药物干预的有效性和比较效果的证据:系统评价和荟萃分析概述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 9;14(1):e076675. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076675.