Suppr超能文献

评估手术创新的挑战。

Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation.

作者信息

Ergina Patrick L, Cook Jonathan A, Blazeby Jane M, Boutron Isabelle, Clavien Pierre-Alain, Reeves Barnaby C, Seiler Christoph M, Altman Douglas G, Aronson Jeffrey K, Barkun Jeffrey S, Campbell W Bruce, Cook Jonathan A, Feldman Liane S, Flum David R, Glasziou Paul, Maddern Guy J, Marshall John C, McCulloch Peter, Nicholl Jon, Strasberg Steven M, Meakins Jonathan L, Ashby Deborah, Black Nick, Bunker John, Burton Martin, Campbell Marion, Chalkidou Kalipso, Chalmers Iain, de Leval Marc, Deeks Jon, Grant Adrian, Gray Muir, Greenhalgh Roger, Jenicek Milos, Kehoe Sean, Lilford Richard, Littlejohns Peter, Loke Yoon, Madhock Rajan, McPherson Kim, Rothwell Peter, Summerskill Bill, Taggart David, Tekkis Parris, Thompson Matthew, Treasure Tom, Trohler Ulrich, Vandenbroucke Jan

机构信息

Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1097-104. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61086-2.

Abstract

Research on surgical interventions is associated with several methodological and practical challenges of which few, if any, apply only to surgery. However, surgical evaluation is especially demanding because many of these challenges coincide. In this report, the second of three on surgical innovation and evaluation, we discuss obstacles related to the study design of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies assessing surgical interventions. We also describe the issues related to the nature of surgical procedures-for example, their complexity, surgeon-related factors, and the range of outcomes. Although difficult, surgical evaluation is achievable and necessary. Solutions tailored to surgical research and a framework for generating evidence on which to base surgical practice are essential.

摘要

手术干预研究面临若干方法学和实际操作方面的挑战,其中几乎没有(如果有的话)仅适用于外科手术的挑战。然而,手术评估的要求特别高,因为这些挑战中有许多同时出现。在本报告(关于手术创新与评估的三篇系列报告中的第二篇)中,我们讨论了与评估手术干预的随机对照试验和非随机研究的研究设计相关的障碍。我们还描述了与手术操作性质相关的问题,例如其复杂性、与外科医生相关的因素以及结果范围。尽管困难,但手术评估是可以实现且必要的。针对手术研究量身定制的解决方案以及生成用于指导手术实践的证据的框架至关重要。

相似文献

1
Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation.
Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1097-104. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61086-2.
4
Surgical evaluation and knowledge transfer--methods of clinical research in surgery.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Dec;397(8):1193-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0775-x. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
5
Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations.
Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1089-96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7.
6
Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the role of coaching in surgery to improve learner outcomes.
Am J Surg. 2018 Jul;216(1):140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
7
Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. doi: 10.3310/hta8360.
8
Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010;50 Suppl 1(s1):10-2. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2010.526838.
9
Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):MR000038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2.
10
Perioperative alcohol cessation intervention for postoperative complications.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 8;11(11):CD008343. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008343.pub3.

引用本文的文献

2
IDEAL-Acu: A Methodological Framework for Evaluating the Effects of Acupuncture.
J Evid Based Med. 2025 Jun;18(2):e70043. doi: 10.1111/jebm.70043.
3
Defining and measuring acceptability of surgical interventions: A scoping review.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 3;20(6):e0323738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323738. eCollection 2025.
4
Intuition-guided Reinforcement Learning for Soft Tissue Manipulation with Unknown Constraints.
Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2025 Apr 14;6:0114. doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0114. eCollection 2025.
6
Feasibility of implementing a rapid-learning methodology to inform radiotherapy treatments: key professional stakeholders' views.
BMJ Oncol. 2024 Mar 13;3(1):e000226. doi: 10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000226. eCollection 2024.
9
Investigating the presence of surgical learning in the Timing of Primary Surgery for cleft palate randomised trial.
Clin Trials. 2025 Apr;22(2):200-208. doi: 10.1177/17407745241302488. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
10
Piezosurgery in Third Molar Extractions: A Systematic Review.
J Pers Med. 2024 Dec 19;14(12):1158. doi: 10.3390/jpm14121158.

本文引用的文献

1
No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations.
Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1105-12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8.
2
The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.
Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.
3
How guidance on the use of interventional procedures is produced in different countries: an international survey.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Apr;25(2):124-33. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309090175.
4
Does the level of experience of residents affect outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Apr;87(4):1127-33; discussion 1133-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.12.080.
9
ASERNIP-S: international trend setting.
ANZ J Surg. 2008 Oct;78(10):853-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04679.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验