Suppr超能文献

多发性硬化症患者中抗IFNβ中和抗体:两种细胞病变效应试验(CPE)用于检测的比较研究。

Neutralizing antibodies against IFN beta in patients with multiple sclerosis: a comparative study of two cytopathic effect tests (CPE) for their detection.

作者信息

Oliver B, Orpez T, Mayorga C, Pinto-Medel M J, Leyva L, López-Gómez C, Marín C, Luque G, Ortega-Pinazo J, Fernández O

机构信息

Research Laboratory, Hospital Civil, Pab. 5, Sótano, 29009 Málaga, Spain.

出版信息

J Immunol Methods. 2009 Dec 31;351(1-2):41-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2009.09.005. Epub 2009 Sep 25.

Abstract

Neutralizing antibodies (NABs) against IFN beta should be measured in specialized laboratories, using a test of inhibition of the cytopathic effect (bioassay or CPE test), based on the capacity of IFNss to block the infection of live monolayer-cultured cells by a virus, depending on the presence or absence of NABs. The European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) considers this assay to be the gold standard. However, the various different ways to perform this assay complicate comparison of the results between laboratories. The World Health Organization (WHO) has published several recommendations to perform this assay using the A549 cell line and the murine encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV). In order to validate the results previously obtained in our laboratory with HEP2/VSV, we undertook a comparative analysis of the two bioassays, HEP2/VSV and A549/EMCV, to assess whether the use of different cell lines and viruses influences sensitivity. We also calibrated the A549/EMCV assay with a reference IFNss. Our results confirm that the bioassay with HEP2/VSV is as sensitive as the assay with A549/EMCV and that a significant association and correlation exist in the results between both assays. Thus, past results with HEP2/VSV in our laboratory could be comparable with those obtained with A549/EMCV in both our laboratory and others.

摘要

应在专业实验室中检测针对干扰素β的中和抗体(NABs),采用细胞病变效应抑制试验(生物测定或CPE试验),该试验基于干扰素β阻断病毒对单层培养活细胞感染的能力,取决于NABs的存在与否。欧洲神经科学学会联合会(EFNS)认为该检测方法是金标准。然而,进行该检测的各种不同方法使得实验室之间的结果比较变得复杂。世界卫生组织(WHO)已发布多项建议,使用A549细胞系和鼠脑心肌炎病毒(EMCV)进行该检测。为了验证我们实验室之前使用HEP2/VSV获得的结果,我们对HEP2/VSV和A549/EMCV这两种生物测定方法进行了比较分析,以评估使用不同的细胞系和病毒是否会影响敏感性。我们还用一种参考干扰素β对A549/EMCV检测进行了校准。我们的结果证实,HEP2/VSV生物测定与A549/EMCV生物测定一样敏感,并且两种检测结果之间存在显著的关联和相关性。因此,我们实验室过去使用HEP2/VSV获得的结果可能与我们实验室及其他实验室使用A549/EMCV获得的结果具有可比性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验