Suppr超能文献

使用频率和应对策略的影响由应对策略量表评估,以及它们与事件后健康和幸福感的关系。

Frequency of use and impact of coping strategies assessed by the COPE Inventory and their relationships to post-event health and well-being.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, 140 7th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, Florida 33701-5016, USA.

出版信息

J Health Psychol. 2009 Oct;14(7):982-91. doi: 10.1177/1359105309341207.

Abstract

In dealing with a stressful event, 440 participants reported how frequently they used a variety of different coping strategies, rated their separate impacts on problems and the associated emotions, and reported their effects on subsequent health and well-being. Coping strategies did not generally impact problems or emotions differently. Use of planning led to increased self-efficacy, which along with positive reinterpretation, predicted growth. Emotional venting and behavioral disengagement predicted diminishment, which along with mental disengagement and self-injury, predicted illness. Social support buffered against diminishment. Use of acceptance coping and seeking advice from others had both positive and negative effects on well-being.

摘要

在应对压力事件时,440 名参与者报告了他们使用各种不同应对策略的频率,评估了这些策略对问题和相关情绪的单独影响,并报告了它们对后续健康和幸福的影响。应对策略通常不会对问题或情绪产生不同的影响。使用计划会导致自我效能感增强,而积极的重新解释则预示着成长。情绪宣泄和行为脱离会导致衰退,而心理脱离和自我伤害则预示着疾病。社会支持可以缓冲衰退。接受应对和向他人寻求建议对幸福感既有积极影响,也有消极影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验