• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西版 HCR-20 评估暴力风险的可靠性。

Reliability of the Brazilian version of HCR-20 Assessing Risk for Violence.

机构信息

Mauricio Cardoso Forensic Psychiatric Institute, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;31(3):253-6. doi: 10.1590/s1516-44462009005000001. Epub 2009 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1590/s1516-44462009005000001
PMID:19787154
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Assessing risk for violence is a complex task often based on not objective or structured clinical evaluations. HCR-20 Assessing Risk for Violence has been used in several countries to increase the accuracy of this exam. The purpose of this study was to inform on central aspects of this instrument, as well as the results of the reliability assessment of the HCR-20 Assessing Risk for Violence in a Brazilian inpatient criminal population.

METHOD

Two examiners independently assessed a random sample of 30 patients that were under criminal commitment at the Mauricio Cardoso Forensic Psychiatric Institute

RESULTS

Mean consensus values means were as follows: Historical = 13.1; Clinical = 4.8 and Risk management = 5.8. The value of the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient for the score of subscale Historical was 0.97, for subscale Clinical it was 0.94, and for subscale Risk management, 0.96. As to the individual items of the HCR-20 Assessing Risk for Violence, the result of the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was good to excellent (mean = 0.97; interval, from 0.60 to 0.99).

CONCLUSION

The interrater reliability of the Brazilian version of the HCR-20 Assessing Risk for Violence scale was similar to the results of studies in other countries.

摘要

目的

评估暴力风险是一项复杂的任务,通常基于非客观或结构化的临床评估。HCR-20 评估暴力风险已在多个国家使用,以提高该评估的准确性。本研究旨在介绍该工具的核心方面,以及 HCR-20 评估暴力风险在巴西住院刑事人群中的可靠性评估结果。

方法

两名评估员对 Mauricio Cardoso 法医精神病学研究所刑事约束下的 30 名随机患者进行了独立评估。

结果

平均共识值平均值如下:历史= 13.1;临床= 4.8 和风险管理= 5.8。历史分量表评分的组内相关系数为 0.97,临床分量表为 0.94,风险管理分量表为 0.96。至于 HCR-20 评估暴力风险的个别项目,组内相关系数的结果为良好至优秀(平均值= 0.97;区间为 0.60 至 0.99)。

结论

HCR-20 评估暴力风险量表的巴西版本的评分者间可靠性与其他国家的研究结果相似。

相似文献

1
Reliability of the Brazilian version of HCR-20 Assessing Risk for Violence.巴西版 HCR-20 评估暴力风险的可靠性。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;31(3):253-6. doi: 10.1590/s1516-44462009005000001. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
2
Accuracy of the Historical, Clinical and Risk Management Scales (HCR-20) in predicting violence and other offenses in forensic psychiatric patients in Brazil.历史、临床和风险管理量表(HCR-20)在预测巴西法医精神病患者暴力和其他犯罪行为的准确性。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2012 Sep-Dec;35(5-6):427-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
3
[Reliability of the Violence Risk Scale of Chinese version].[中文版暴力风险量表的信度]
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Feb;28(1):32-5.
4
Predictive accuracy of the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 for violence in forensic psychiatric wards in Japan.日本法医精神病病房中Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20对暴力行为的预测准确性。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2017 Dec;27(5):409-420. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2007. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
5
Assessing risk for inpatient physical violence in a female forensic psychiatric sample - comparing HCR-20v2 with the female additional manual to the HCR-20v2.评估女性法医精神病学样本中住院身体暴力风险——比较HCR-20v2与HCR-20v2女性补充手册。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2019 May-Jul;73(4-5):248-256. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2019.1613447. Epub 2019 May 12.
6
[Patients in forensic and general psychiatry. Do risk assessment measures detect differing risks of future violence?].[法医精神病学和普通精神病学中的患者。风险评估措施能否检测出未来暴力的不同风险?]
Nervenarzt. 2006 May;77(5):576-86. doi: 10.1007/s00115-005-1918-5.
7
Violence risk assessment and women: predictive accuracy of the HCR-20 in a civil psychiatric sample.暴力风险评估与女性:HCR-20 在民事精神病学样本中的预测准确性。
Behav Sci Law. 2011 Sep-Oct;29(5):623-33. doi: 10.1002/bsl.1005. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
8
Assessing the reliability, predictive and construct validity of historical, clinical and risk management-20 (HCR-20) in Mexican psychiatric inpatients.评估墨西哥精神病住院患者中历史、临床及风险管理-20(HCR-20)量表的信度、预测效度和结构效度。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;70(6):456-61. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2016.1159330. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
9
Multirater reliability of the historical, clinical, and risk management-20.历史、临床及风险管理-20的多评估者信度
Assessment. 2014 Feb;21(1):15-27. doi: 10.1177/1073191113514107. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
10
[Violence risk assessment in forensic patients using HCR-20v3: interrater reliability and concurrent validity].[使用HCR-20v3对法医鉴定患者进行暴力风险评估:评分者间信度和同时效度]
Vertex. 2021 Mar;XXXII(151):32-44. doi: 10.53680/vertex.v32i151.23.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine Learning for prediction of violent behaviors in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a systematic review.机器学习用于预测精神分裂症谱系障碍中的暴力行为:一项系统综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 21;15:1384828. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1384828. eCollection 2024.
2
Risk Assessment Instruments for Intimate Partner Femicide: A Systematic Review.亲密伴侣杀妻风险评估工具:系统评价
Front Psychol. 2022 May 31;13:896901. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896901. eCollection 2022.
3
Analysis on mental-insanity and cessation-of-dangerousness examinations in three Brazilian custodial institutions: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
巴西三家监管机构的精神障碍和危险终止检查分析:一项回顾性横断面研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2021 Nov 15;139(6):624-634. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0450.R1.22042021. eCollection 2021.
4
Brazilian guidelines for the management of psychomotor agitation. Part 1. Non-pharmacological approach.巴西精神运动性激越管理指南。第 1 部分。非药物治疗方法。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2019 Mar-Apr;41(2):153-167. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2018-0163. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
5
Cessation of dangerousness status: an analysis of 224 reports from the Instituto de Perícias Heitor Carrilho, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.危险性状态的终止:对巴西里约热内卢海托尔·卡里略法医研究所224份报告的分析
Braz J Psychiatry. 2017 Jan-Mar;39(1):45-54. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2015-1871. Epub 2016 Sep 29.