Suppr超能文献

[法医精神病学和普通精神病学中的患者。风险评估措施能否检测出未来暴力的不同风险?]

[Patients in forensic and general psychiatry. Do risk assessment measures detect differing risks of future violence?].

作者信息

Lincoln T M, Hodgins S, Jöckel D, Freese R, Born P, Eucker S, Schmidt P, Gretenkord L, Müller-Isberner R

机构信息

Klinik für Forensische Psychiatrie, Haina.

出版信息

Nervenarzt. 2006 May;77(5):576-86. doi: 10.1007/s00115-005-1918-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the potential for future violent behaviour comparing patients recruited from forensic and general psychiatric wards in Germany.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty patients were recruited from a forensic hospital and 29 from a general psychiatric hospital. In the weeks preceding discharge, structured assessments of the future risk of violent behaviour were completed using the HCR-20.

RESULTS

There was little difference in the risk presented by the two groups. Forensic patients presented an elevated risk of violence because of historical factors, while the risk among patients from general psychiatry was due to clinical symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Some criminal offences could be prevented if more time and effort were spent in general psychiatric practice in identifying patients at high risk for violence and in reducing symptoms of psychoses before discharge.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较从德国法医病房和普通精神科病房招募的患者未来发生暴力行为的可能性。

患者与方法

从一家法医医院招募了50名患者,从一家普通精神病医院招募了29名患者。在出院前的几周内,使用HCR-20对未来暴力行为的风险进行了结构化评估。

结果

两组呈现的风险差异不大。法医病房的患者因既往因素存在较高的暴力风险,而普通精神科患者的风险则归因于临床症状。

结论

如果在普通精神科诊疗中投入更多时间和精力来识别暴力高风险患者,并在出院前减轻精神病症状,一些刑事犯罪是可以预防的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验