Suppr超能文献

评估尿液中的游离细胞 DNA 作为膀胱癌诊断的标志物。

Evaluation of cell-free DNA in urine as a marker for bladder cancer diagnosis.

机构信息

ABO Association, Center for the Study of Biological Markers of Malignancy, AULSS 12, Venice, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Biol Markers. 2009 Jul-Sep;24(3):147-55. doi: 10.1177/172460080902400304.

Abstract

The diagnosis and follow-up of bladder cancer are mainly based on cystoscopy, an invasive method which could be negative in case of flat malignancies such as carcinoma in situ. Other noninvasive diagnostic methods have not yet given satisfactory results. There is a need for a reliable yet noninvasive method for the detection of bladder cancer. Our aim was to investigate whether cell-free DNA quantified in urine (ucf-DNA) could be a useful marker for the diagnosis of bladder cancer. A standard urine test was performed in 150 naturally voided morning urine samples that were processed to obtain a quantitative evaluation of ucf-DNA. Leukocyturia and/or bacteriuria were found in 18 subjects, who were excluded from the study. Statistical analysis was performed on 45 bladder cancer patients and 87 healthy subjects. Ucf-DNA was extracted from urine samples by a spin column-based method and quantified using four different methods: GeneQuant Pro (Amersham Biosciences, Pittsburg, PA, USA), Quant-iT DNA high-sensitivity assay kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), Real-Time PCR (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and NanoDrop 1000 (NanoDrop Technologies, Houston, TX, USA). Median free DNA quantification did not differ statistically between bladder cancer patients and healthy subjects. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was developed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ucf-DNA quantification for each method. The area under the ROC curve was 0.578 for GeneQuant Pro, 0.573 for the Quant-iT DNA high-sensitivity assay kit, 0.507 for Real-Time PCR, and 0.551 for NanoDrop 1000, which indicated that ucf-DNA quantification by these methods is not able to discriminate between the presence and absence of bladder cancer. No association was found between ucf-DNA quantification and tumor size or tumor focality. In conclusion, ucf-DNA isolated by a spin column-based method and quantified by GeneQuant Pro, Quant-iT DNA high-sensitivity assay kit, Real-Time PCR or NanoDrop 1000 does not seem to be a reliable marker for the diagnosis of bladder cancer.

摘要

膀胱癌的诊断和随访主要基于膀胱镜检查,这是一种侵入性方法,在平坦的恶性肿瘤(如原位癌)的情况下可能呈阴性。其他非侵入性诊断方法尚未取得满意的结果。因此,需要一种可靠的非侵入性方法来检测膀胱癌。我们的目的是研究尿液中游离 DNA 的定量(ucf-DNA)是否可以作为膀胱癌诊断的有用标志物。对 150 例自然排空的晨尿样本进行了标准尿液检测,并对其进行了处理,以获得 ucf-DNA 的定量评估。18 例受试者存在白细胞尿和/或菌尿,被排除在研究之外。对 45 例膀胱癌患者和 87 例健康受试者进行了统计分析。通过基于离心柱的方法从尿液样本中提取 ucf-DNA,并使用四种不同的方法对其进行定量:GeneQuant Pro(Amersham Biosciences,匹兹堡,PA,美国),Quant-iT DNA 高灵敏度试剂盒(Invitrogen,卡尔斯巴德,CA,美国),实时 PCR(Applied Biosystems,福斯特城,CA,美国)和 NanoDrop 1000(NanoDrop Technologies,休斯顿,TX,美国)。膀胱癌患者和健康受试者之间的游离 DNA 定量中位数无统计学差异。绘制了接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线,以评估每种方法的 ucf-DNA 定量的诊断性能。GeneQuant Pro 的 ROC 曲线下面积为 0.578,Quant-iT DNA 高灵敏度试剂盒为 0.573,实时 PCR 为 0.507,NanoDrop 1000 为 0.551,表明这些方法的 ucf-DNA 定量不能区分膀胱癌的存在与否。未发现 ucf-DNA 定量与肿瘤大小或肿瘤焦点之间存在关联。总之,通过离心柱法分离的 ucf-DNA,并用 GeneQuant Pro、Quant-iT DNA 高灵敏度试剂盒、实时 PCR 或 NanoDrop 1000 定量,似乎不是膀胱癌诊断的可靠标志物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验