Suppr超能文献

脑刺激奖赏中的兴奋性氨基酸通路。

Excitatory amino acid pathways in brain-stimulation reward.

作者信息

Herberg L J, Rose I C

机构信息

Experimental Psychology Laboratory, Institute of Neurology, London, U.K.

出版信息

Behav Brain Res. 1990 Aug 20;39(3):230-9. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(90)90029-e.

Abstract

A range of agonists and antagonists active at different glutamate/aspartate (Glu/Asp) receptor subtypes were injected into rat ventral tegmental (VTA) sites downstream from self-stimulation electrodes in the medial forebrain bundle. Control injections were made into the contralateral tegmentum. Variable-interval (VI 10 s) self-stimulation was not significantly affected by a specific antagonist of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-type receptors (D,L-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (2-AP5), 10 and 50 nmol). Broad-spectrum excitatory amino acid (EAA) antagonists viz cis-2,3-piperidine dicarboxylate (cPDA) (10 and 50 nmol), gamma-D-glutamylaminomethyl sulphonic acid (GAMS) (10 nmol) and p-chlorobenzoyl-2,3-piperazine dicarboxylic acid (pCB PzDA) (2.0 and 10 nmol), active at kainate, quisqualate, as well as NMDA receptors, all produced significant depression of responding when injected into the ipsilateral, but not the contralateral, tegmentum. Compounds inhibiting Glu/Asp reuptake had variable effects: strong depression with dihydrokainic acid (7.5 nmol), or no significant effect (L-threo-3-hydroxyaspartic acid, 2.0 and 10 nmol). The receptor agonist, NMDA (10 nmol), depressed responding regardless of injection side; kainic and responding regardless of injection side; kainic and quisqualic acid elicited myoclonic and other non-specific responses in preliminary tests, and were not examined further; enhanced responding was not seen. The side-specific blockade of responding by non-NMDA antagonists indicates the existence of non-NMDA EAA terminals in the VTA, signalling the receipt of hypothalamic brain-stimulation reward. Caudally directed EAA projections terminating on A10 dopamine cell bodies may account for depression of self-stimulation by EAA antagonists.

摘要

一系列作用于不同谷氨酸/天冬氨酸(Glu/Asp)受体亚型的激动剂和拮抗剂被注射到内侧前脑束中自刺激电极下游的大鼠腹侧被盖区(VTA)部位。对照注射则注入对侧被盖区。可变间隔(VI 10秒)的自刺激不受N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)型受体的特异性拮抗剂(D,L-2-氨基-5-磷酸戊酸(2-AP5),10和50纳摩尔)的显著影响。广谱兴奋性氨基酸(EAA)拮抗剂,即顺式-2,3-哌啶二羧酸(cPDA)(10和50纳摩尔)、γ-D-谷氨酰胺甲基磺酸(GAMS)(10纳摩尔)和对氯苯甲酰-2,3-哌嗪二羧酸(pCB PzDA)(2.0和10纳摩尔),它们作用于 kainate、quisqualate以及NMDA受体,当注入同侧而非对侧被盖区时,均会使反应显著降低。抑制Glu/Asp再摄取的化合物产生了不同的效果:二氢kainic酸(7.5纳摩尔)导致强烈抑制,而L-苏式-3-羟基天冬氨酸(2.0和10纳摩尔)则无显著影响。受体激动剂NMDA(10纳摩尔)无论注射在哪一侧均会降低反应;kainic酸和quisqualic酸在初步试验中引发了肌阵挛和其他非特异性反应,未作进一步研究;未观察到反应增强的情况。非NMDA拮抗剂对反应的侧别特异性阻断表明VTA中存在非NMDA EAA终末,提示下丘脑脑刺激奖赏的接收。终止于A10多巴胺细胞体的尾向EAA投射可能是EAA拮抗剂降低自刺激的原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验