Malette J, Miliaressis E
School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ont., Canada.
Behav Brain Res. 1995 Jun;68(2):117-37. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(94)00170-k.
The MFB substrate of self-stimulation (SS) has generally been viewed as a unilateral system. We re-examined this belief with pairs of moveable SS electrodes placed bilaterally in the MFB. Rats barpressed for trains of single or twin cathodal pulses of fixed intensity and width and of variable frequency. The first (C) and second (T) pulse of each pair was delivered through the left and right electrode or inversely. C-T intervals ranging from 0.2 to 5.0 ms were tested. The frequency of C pulses required for criterial bar-pressing was used to plot the stimulation efficacy (SE), as a function of the C-T interval and pulse presentation order. The electrodes were subsequently moved and the same procedure repeated for more ventral sites. With some pairs of contralateral hypothalamic (H) sites, the SE was independent of the C-T interval. However, with other pairs of contralateral H sites, the SE increased with C-T interval in a manner resembling a collision effect, with the important exception that no conduction time (CT) was apparent in the data. The absence of CT excludes the presence of a genuine collision effect. When one pulse was sent to the H and another to the contralateral ventral tegmentum (VT), the H-VT curve rose always earlier than the VT-H curve, thus resembling a transynaptic collision effect. However, the C-T interval at which the VT-H curve began rising (always 1.0 ms or less) fails to support the contention that the electrodes activated fibers separated by a synapse. Finally, a typical collision effect was noted with ipsilateral H-VT electrode placements, confirming the presence of direct linkage between ipsilateral MFB sites. Computer-generated data based on two parsimonious assumptions were found to match the empirical results. These assumptions were that each electrode activated a different branch of the same reward neuron and that conduction failure occurred at the branchpoint. The model, which posits that a large number of MFB reward neurons send branches to the other hemisphere, is testable and makes clear-cut predictions about the effects of lesions. In a preliminary test, we recorded the H and contralateral VT threshold frequencies before and after lesioning the H. The H threshold increased more when using small pulse current and remained constant throughout the 4-week testing period. The VT threshold was elevated more for intermediate pulse current and kept increasing with time.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
自我刺激(SS)的内侧前脑束(MFB)底物通常被视为单侧系统。我们通过将可移动的SS电极双侧放置在MFB中来重新审视这一观点。大鼠按压杠杆以获取固定强度、宽度和可变频率的单脉冲或双阴极脉冲串。每对脉冲中的第一个(C)和第二个(T)脉冲分别通过左电极和右电极或相反方式传递。测试了0.2至5.0毫秒范围内的C-T间隔。将达到标准按压杠杆所需的C脉冲频率用于绘制刺激效果(SE),作为C-T间隔和脉冲呈现顺序的函数。随后移动电极,并在更靠腹侧的部位重复相同程序。对于一些对侧下丘脑(H)部位的电极对,SE与C-T间隔无关。然而,对于其他对侧H部位的电极对,SE随着C-T间隔的增加而增加,其方式类似于碰撞效应,但重要的例外是数据中没有明显的传导时间(CT)。CT的缺失排除了真正碰撞效应的存在。当一个脉冲发送到H,另一个发送到对侧腹侧被盖区(VT)时,H-VT曲线总是比VT-H曲线更早上升,因此类似于跨突触碰撞效应。然而,VT-H曲线开始上升时的C-T间隔(总是1.0毫秒或更短)并不支持电极激活由突触分隔的纤维这一观点。最后,在同侧H-VT电极放置时观察到典型的碰撞效应,证实了同侧MFB部位之间存在直接联系。基于两个简约假设的计算机生成数据与实验结果相符。这些假设是每个电极激活同一个奖励神经元的不同分支,并且在分支点发生传导失败。该模型假设大量MFB奖励神经元向另一半球发送分支,是可测试的,并对损伤的影响做出明确预测。在初步测试中,我们记录了损毁H前后H和对侧VT的阈值频率。使用小脉冲电流时,H阈值增加更多,并且在整个4周测试期内保持不变。对于中等脉冲电流,VT阈值升高更多,并且随时间持续增加。(摘要截断于250字)