INSERM (Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale), Faculté de Médecine BP 184, Université de Nancy, F-54505 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy Cedex.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Feb;89(2):90-8. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181bc0cf4.
To compare the effects of comprehensive directed breathing retraining with traditional diaphragmatic breathing on male smokers with exertional dyspnea but normal spirometry.
This is a prospective randomized clinical trial in an exercise laboratory at a university hospital. Twenty-four nonmedicated exertional dyspnea subjects were randomly assigned to experimental (comprehensive directed breathing) and control (traditional diaphragmatic breathing) groups. Forty-four physiologic parameters associated with exertional dyspnea were studied before and after interventions for both groups at rest and at 40-W constant exercise for 10 mins. The interventions for both groups included diaphragmatic breathing exercises, walking, and arm exercises for 90 mins, 5 days/wk for 4 wks. In addition, the comprehensive directed breathing group was taught the anatomy and physiology of ventilation; they observed their ventilatory dyssynchrony in a mirror; they were shown their ventilatory rhythm on a spirogram; diaphragmatic movement was demonstrated in an educational movie; and verbal feedback was used to correct respiratory asynchrony.
We compared the relative changes of lung function parameters before and after intervention for each group. The comprehensive directed breathing group improvements were significantly greater (P < 0.05) than those of traditional diaphragmatic breathing for 34 of 44 lung function parameters.
Comprehensive directed breathing training improved exertional dyspnea, Dyspnea Index, and some clinical and functional parameters significantly more than traditional diaphragmatic breathing training.
比较综合定向呼吸训练与传统膈式呼吸对运动性呼吸困难但肺功能正常的男性吸烟者的影响。
这是一项在大学医院运动实验室进行的前瞻性随机临床试验。将 24 名未经药物治疗的运动性呼吸困难受试者随机分配到实验组(综合定向呼吸)和对照组(传统膈式呼吸)。在干预前和干预后,对两组在休息和 40-W 持续运动 10 分钟时的 44 个与运动性呼吸困难相关的生理参数进行研究。两组的干预均包括膈式呼吸练习、步行和手臂练习,每周 5 天,共 4 周。此外,综合定向呼吸组还教授了通气的解剖学和生理学知识;他们在镜子中观察自己的通气不同步;他们在肺活量计上观察自己的通气节律;演示了膈肌运动的教育电影;并使用口头反馈来纠正呼吸不同步。
我们比较了每组干预前后肺功能参数的相对变化。综合定向呼吸组的改善明显大于(P <0.05)传统膈式呼吸组的 34/44 个肺功能参数。
综合定向呼吸训练比传统膈式呼吸训练更能显著改善运动性呼吸困难、呼吸困难指数和一些临床及功能参数。