• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝移植治疗途径的潜在节省:成本上升因素的跨部门分析。

Potential savings in the treatment pathway of liver transplantation: an inter-sectorial analysis of cost-rising factors.

机构信息

Department of Health Economics and Health Policy, Institute of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.

Core Facility Quality Management Transplantation, Integrated Research and Treatment Center Transplantation (IFB-Tx), Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Mar;20(2):281-301. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0994-y. Epub 2018 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-018-0994-y
PMID:30051153
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Identification of cost-driving factors in patients undergoing liver transplantation is essential to target reallocation of resources and potential savings.

AIM

The aim of this study is to identify main cost-driving factors in liver transplantation from the perspective of the Statutory Health Insurance.

METHODS

Variables were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression to determine their influence on high cost cases (fourth quartile) in the outpatient, inpatient and rehabilitative healthcare sectors as well as for medications.

RESULTS

Significant cost-driving factors for the inpatient sector of care were a high labMELD-score (OR 1.042), subsequent re-transplantations (OR 7.159) and patient mortality (OR 3.555). Expenditures for rehabilitative care were significantly higher in patients with a lower adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (OR 0.601). The indication of viral cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma resulted in significantly higher costs for medications (OR 21.618 and 7.429). For all sectors of care and medications each waiting day had a significant impact on high treatment costs (OR 1.001). Overall, cost-driving factors resulted in higher median treatment costs of 211,435 €.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment costs in liver transplantation were significantly influenced by identified factors. Long pre-transplant waiting times that increase overall treatment costs need to be alleviated by a substantial increase in donor organs to enable transplantation with lower labMELD-scores. Disease management programs, the implementation of a case management for vulnerable patients, medication plans and patient tracking in a transplant registry may enable cost savings, e.g., by the avoidance of otherwise necessary re-transplants or incorrect medication.

摘要

简介

从法定医疗保险的角度确定肝移植患者的成本驱动因素对于重新分配资源和潜在节约具有重要意义。

目的

本研究旨在从法定医疗保险的角度确定肝移植的主要成本驱动因素。

方法

使用多变量逻辑回归分析变量,以确定它们对外科门诊、住院和康复医疗部门以及药物治疗的高费用病例(第四四分位数)的影响。

结果

护理住院部门的显著成本驱动因素包括较高的实验室 MELD 评分(OR 1.042)、后续再次移植(OR 7.159)和患者死亡率(OR 3.555)。调整后的 Charlson 合并症指数较低的患者,康复护理费用显著较高(OR 0.601)。病毒性肝硬化和肝细胞癌的指征导致药物治疗费用显著增加(OR 21.618 和 7.429)。对于所有护理和药物治疗部门,每等待一天都会对高治疗费用产生显著影响(OR 1.001)。总体而言,成本驱动因素导致中位治疗费用增加 211,435 欧元。

结论

肝移植的治疗费用受到确定因素的显著影响。通过大量增加供体器官,以降低实验室 MELD 评分进行移植,可以缓解移植前等待时间长导致的总体治疗费用增加的问题。疾病管理计划、为弱势患者实施病例管理、药物治疗计划以及在移植登记处对患者进行跟踪,可能会节省成本,例如避免不必要的再次移植或错误的药物治疗。

相似文献

1
Potential savings in the treatment pathway of liver transplantation: an inter-sectorial analysis of cost-rising factors.肝移植治疗途径的潜在节省:成本上升因素的跨部门分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Mar;20(2):281-301. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0994-y. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
2
High resource utilization in liver transplantation-how strongly differ costs between the care sectors and what are the main cost drivers?: a retrospective study.肝移植中的高资源利用——不同护理部门之间的成本差异有多大,以及主要成本驱动因素是什么?:一项回顾性研究。
Transpl Int. 2017 Jun;30(6):621-637. doi: 10.1111/tri.12950.
3
The costs of change: direct medical costs of solid organ transplantation in British Columbia, Canada, 1995-2003.变革成本:1995-2003 年加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省实体器官移植的直接医疗成本。
Value Health. 2009 Mar-Apr;12(2):282-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00445.x. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
4
Cost analysis of liver transplantation in Turkey.土耳其肝移植的成本分析。
Transplant Proc. 2011 Dec;43(10):3783-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.09.018.
5
[Liver transplantation for chronic liver disease: hospital costs].[慢性肝病的肝移植:医院费用]
Presse Med. 2007 Feb;36(2 Pt 1):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2006.07.009. Epub 2007 Jan 8.
6
Cost of a quality-adjusted life year in liver transplantation: the influence of the indication and the model for end-stage liver disease score.肝移植中质量调整生命年的成本:适应证和终末期肝病模型评分的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2011 Nov;17(11):1333-43. doi: 10.1002/lt.22388.
7
Higher MELD score increases the overall cost on the waiting list for liver transplantation: a micro-costing analysis based study.较高的终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分会增加肝移植等待名单上的总体成本:一项基于微观成本分析的研究。
Arq Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul-Sept;54(3):238-245. doi: 10.1590/S0004-2803.201700000-35. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
8
Healthcare resource utilization and costs by disease severity in an insured national sample of US patients with chronic hepatitis B.医疗保险覆盖的美国慢性乙型肝炎患者疾病严重程度与医疗资源利用和费用的关系。
J Hepatol. 2019 Jan;70(1):24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.09.021. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
9
Annual Burden and Costs of Hospitalization for High-Need, High-Cost Patients With Chronic Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases.慢性胃肠道和肝脏疾病的高需求、高费用患者住院的年度负担和费用。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Aug;16(8):1284-1292.e30. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
10
[Cost evaluation of a model for integrated care of seriously mentally ill patients].[严重精神疾病患者综合护理模式的成本评估]
Gesundheitswesen. 2014 Feb;76(2):86-95. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1343438. Epub 2013 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimation of lifetime costs for patients receiving a transplant: the case of liver transplantation related to hepatitis B in Italy.估计接受移植的患者的终身费用:以意大利乙型肝炎相关肝移植为例。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 3;12:1328782. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1328782. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluation of liver transplantation services in Kazakhstan from 2012 to 2023.2012年至2023年哈萨克斯坦肝脏移植服务评估
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 23;14(1):9304. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60086-7.
3
Adult Stem Cell Therapy as Regenerative Medicine for End-Stage Liver Disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Higher MELD score increases the overall cost on the waiting list for liver transplantation: a micro-costing analysis based study.较高的终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分会增加肝移植等待名单上的总体成本:一项基于微观成本分析的研究。
Arq Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul-Sept;54(3):238-245. doi: 10.1590/S0004-2803.201700000-35. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
2
Differences in Phenotypes and Liver Transplantation Outcomes by Age Group in Patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.原发性硬化性胆管炎患者不同年龄组的表型及肝移植结局差异
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Nov;62(11):3200-3209. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4559-1. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
3
High resource utilization in liver transplantation-how strongly differ costs between the care sectors and what are the main cost drivers?: a retrospective study.
成人干细胞治疗作为终末期肝病的再生医学。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022;1401:57-72. doi: 10.1007/5584_2022_719.
4
Current Challenges in the Post-Transplant Care of Liver Transplant Recipients in Germany.德国肝移植受者移植后护理的当前挑战
J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 5;9(11):3570. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113570.
肝移植中的高资源利用——不同护理部门之间的成本差异有多大,以及主要成本驱动因素是什么?:一项回顾性研究。
Transpl Int. 2017 Jun;30(6):621-637. doi: 10.1111/tri.12950.
4
Comparison of risk adjustment methods in patients with liver disease using electronic medical record data.使用电子病历数据对肝病患者风险调整方法的比较
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 7;17(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12876-016-0559-4.
5
Liver transplantation after share 35: Impact on pretransplant and posttransplant costs and mortality.共享35后的肝移植:对移植前和移植后成本及死亡率的影响
Liver Transpl. 2017 Jan;23(1):11-18. doi: 10.1002/lt.24641. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
6
MELD score measured day 10 after orthotopic liver transplantation predicts death and re-transplantation within the first year.原位肝移植术后第10天测得的终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分可预测患者在第一年内的死亡和再次移植情况。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;51(11):1360-6. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1196497. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
7
Inpatient Rehabilitation after Liver Transplantation Decreases Risk and Severity of 30-Day Readmissions.肝移植后住院康复可降低30天再入院的风险和严重程度。
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jul;223(1):164-171.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.01.061. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
8
The new liver allocation score for transplantation is validated and improved transplant survival benefit in Germany but not in the United Kingdom.用于移植的新肝脏分配评分在德国得到验证,且改善了移植后的生存获益,但在英国并非如此。
Liver Transpl. 2016 Jun;22(6):743-56. doi: 10.1002/lt.24421.
9
The Charlson comorbidity index can be used prospectively to identify patients who will incur high future costs.查尔森合并症指数可用于前瞻性地识别未来将产生高额费用的患者。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 3;9(12):e112479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112479. eCollection 2014.
10
Assessing variation in the costs of care among patients awaiting liver transplantation.评估等待肝移植患者的护理成本差异。
Am J Transplant. 2014 Jan;14(1):70-8. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12494. Epub 2013 Oct 28.